munotes®

Injunction and Specific Restitution of Property

Chapter Sixty-Seven

Syllabus topic 3.4, "Judicial and Extra Judicial Remedies."

Pages 271 to 274 of 434

In one line

An injunction stops a wrong from continuing or beginning, and specific restitution gives the plaintiff back the very thing he lost.

In the wording a student can write in an exam: besides damages, a plaintiff in tort may obtain an injunction, which is an order restraining the defendant from doing or continuing a wrongful act or, in its mandatory form, compelling him to undo it, and specific restitution of property, which is the recovery of the property itself; injunctions in India are governed by sections 36 to 42 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 and recovery of property by sections 5 to 8 of the same Act.

Injunctions: the statutory scheme

Section 36 provides that preventive relief is granted at the discretion of the court by injunction, temporary or perpetual.

Section 37 defines the two: a temporary injunction continues until a specified time or until further order of the court, and is regulated by the Code of Civil Procedure 1908; a perpetual injunction can be granted only by the decree made at the hearing and upon the merits of the suit, and thereby the defendant is perpetually enjoined from asserting a right or committing an act which would be contrary to the plaintiff's rights.

Section 38 governs the perpetual injunction. It may be granted to prevent the breach of an obligation existing in the plaintiff's favour, and, where the obligation arises from contract, the court is guided by the rules in Chapter II. Where the defendant invades or threatens to invade the plaintiff's right to, or enjoyment of, property, the court may grant a perpetual injunction where the defendant is trustee of the property for the plaintiff, where there exists no standard for ascertaining the actual damage caused or likely to be caused by the invasion, where the invasion is such that compensation in money would not afford adequate relief, and where the injunction is necessary to prevent a multiplicity of judicial proceedings.

Those four situations are the answer to "when will a court grant an injunction rather than damages", and they should be reproduced.

Section 39 governs the mandatory injunction: where to prevent the breach of an obligation it is necessary to compel the performance of certain acts which the court is capable of enforcing, the court may in its discretion grant an injunction to prevent the breach complained of and also to compel performance of the requisite acts.

Section 40 allows damages to be awarded in addition to or in substitution for an injunction, and requires the plaintiff to claim them in his plaint, though the court may allow an amendment.

Section 41 lists the cases in which an injunction cannot be granted, among them: to restrain a person from prosecuting a pending judicial proceeding, except to prevent a multiplicity of proceedings; to restrain proceedings in a court not subordinate to the one from which the injunction is sought; to restrain a person from applying to a legislative body; to restrain proceedings in a criminal matter; to prevent the breach of a contract which could not be specifically enforced; to prevent an act of which it is not reasonably clear that it will be a nuisance; to prevent a continuing breach in which the plaintiff has acquiesced; where equally efficacious relief can certainly be obtained by any other usual mode of proceeding, except in the case of breach of trust; and where the conduct of the plaintiff or his agents disentitles him to the assistance of the court.

munotes.in271

Injunction and Specific Restitution of Property

Section 42 allows an injunction to enforce a negative agreement in certain cases.

Specific restitution of property

Section 5 provides that a person entitled to the possession of specific immovable property may recover it in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, that is, by an ordinary suit on title.

Section 6 is the summary suit for a person dispossessed without his consent otherwise than in due course of law: he may recover possession notwithstanding any other title set up in the suit, must sue within six months of the dispossession, may not sue the Government, and there is no appeal or review from the decree, though he or the defeated party may afterwards sue on title. Chapter [Remedies for Trespass to Land] works out the difference between sections 5 and 6.

Section 7 allows a person entitled to the possession of specific movable property to recover it in the manner provided by the Code, and its Explanations allow a trustee to sue and treat a special or temporary right to present possession as sufficient.

Section 8 allows a person having possession or control of an article of movable property of which he is not the owner to be compelled to deliver it specifically to the person entitled to its immediate possession, in four cases: where he holds it as the plaintiff's agent or trustee; where compensation in money would not afford adequate relief; where it would be extremely difficult to ascertain the actual damage; and where possession has been wrongfully transferred from the plaintiff. Its Explanation presumes the second and third in the plaintiff's favour until the contrary is proved.

A worked example

A factory next to Ismail's house begins running a generator at night, and its contractor has also built a shed one metre inside Ismail's boundary and taken away his water pump.

A temporary injunction under sections 36 and 37, on an application in the suit, to stop the night running while the case is heard.

munotes.in272

Injunction and Specific Restitution of Property

A perpetual injunction under section 38 at the trial: the invasion is of his right to the enjoyment of property, there is no standard for ascertaining the damage caused by lost sleep, and money would not be adequate relief, so two of the four situations in section 38 are satisfied.

A mandatory injunction under section 39 to pull down the shed, since preventing the breach requires the defendant to be compelled to do an act.

Damages under section 40, in addition to the injunction, provided he claims them in the plaint.

The pump is specific movable property. He may sue under section 7 to recover it, and rely on section 8 to compel its specific delivery if money would not be adequate relief or the damage would be difficult to ascertain, the Explanation presuming both in his favour.

And if the factory had dispossessed him of part of his land, section 6 gives a summary suit within six months in which the factory's title is irrelevant.

What it does NOT mean

An injunction is not available as of right. Section 36 makes preventive relief discretionary.

It is not available in every case. Section 41 lists the cases in which it cannot be granted at all.

Damages and an injunction are not alternatives the plaintiff may pick at the end. Section 40 requires damages to be claimed in the plaint, though an amendment may be allowed.

Specific restitution is not automatic for movables. Section 8 sets out the four cases in which delivery of the thing itself may be compelled.

Quick revision

  1. Section 36: preventive relief by injunction, temporary or perpetual, at the court's discretion.
  2. Section 37: a temporary injunction lasts till a time or further order and is regulated by the Code of Civil Procedure 1908; a perpetual injunction is granted by the decree at the hearing on the merits.
  3. Section 38: four situations for a perpetual injunction, including no standard for ascertaining damage, money not adequate relief, and prevention of a multiplicity of proceedings.
  4. Section 39: mandatory injunction, to compel acts necessary to prevent the breach.
  5. Section 40: damages in addition to or in substitution for an injunction, claimed in the plaint.
  6. Section 41: the cases in which an injunction cannot be granted, including acquiescence, criminal proceedings and equally efficacious relief elsewhere.
  7. Sections 5 and 6: recovery of immovable property on title, and the summary suit within six months.
  8. Sections 7 and 8: recovery of movable property, and the four cases in which specific delivery may be compelled, with a presumption in the plaintiff's favour.

Test yourself

1. When will a court grant an injunction instead of damages? Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 names the situations. Where the defendant invades or threatens to invade the plaintiff's right to, or enjoyment of, property, a perpetual injunction may be granted where the defendant is trustee of the property for the plaintiff; where there exists no standard for ascertaining the actual damage caused or likely to be caused by the invasion; where the invasion is such that compensation in money would not afford adequate relief; and where the injunction is necessary to prevent a multiplicity of judicial proceedings. The remedy is discretionary under section 36, and section 41 lists cases in which it cannot be granted at all, including where the plaintiff has acquiesced in a continuing breach, where equally efficacious relief can certainly be obtained by another usual mode of proceeding, and where his own conduct disentitles him to the court's assistance. Section 40 allows damages to be awarded in addition to or in substitution for an injunction, if claimed in the plaint.

munotes.in273

Injunction and Specific Restitution of Property

2. Distinguish a temporary from a perpetual and a mandatory injunction. Section 37 draws the first distinction: a temporary injunction continues until a specified time or until further order of the court, may be granted at any stage of a suit, and is regulated by the Code of Civil Procedure 1908; a perpetual injunction can be granted only by the decree made at the hearing and upon the merits, and it perpetually enjoins the defendant from asserting a right or committing an act contrary to the plaintiff's rights. A mandatory injunction, under section 39, is different in kind rather than in duration: instead of restraining the defendant it compels him to perform acts necessary to prevent the breach, for example to demolish a structure he has built, and it is granted where the court is capable of enforcing the performance of those acts.

3. How does a plaintiff recover the thing itself rather than its value? For immovable property, by a suit under section 5 of the Specific Relief Act 1963, brought on title in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, or, if he was dispossessed without his consent otherwise than in due course of law, by the summary suit under section 6, which must be brought within six months, cannot be brought against the Government, and is decided without regard to title, no appeal or review lying from the decree. For movable property, by a suit under section 7, a trustee being competent to sue and a special or temporary right to present possession being sufficient; and where the defendant has possession or control of an article of which he is not the owner, section 8 allows the court to compel specific delivery in four cases: where he holds it as the plaintiff's agent or trustee, where compensation in money would not be adequate relief, where the actual damage would be extremely difficult to ascertain, and where possession has been wrongfully transferred from the plaintiff, with a presumption in the plaintiff's favour on the second and third.

munotes.in274

The rest of this subject

These notes are cut from the University's printed syllabus. Open the syllabus itself, or the past papers, for the same subject.

Report or request
Done!