Structural Change in the Indian Economy
Chapter Twenty-Three
Syllabus topic 2.1, "Salient features of Indian Economy and Structural changes"
Pages 139 to 144 of 556
In one line
Structural change means the shift in where a country's output and its workers come from: in India, output moved out of agriculture and into services, and the workers did not follow at anything like the same speed.
In the wording a student can write in an exam: structural change refers to the long term alteration in the relative importance of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors in a country's output and employment, together with the accompanying changes in the composition of demand, in occupational structure, in the organisation of production and in the country's external trade.
What theory expects, and what India did
The expected pattern. Colin Clark and Jean Fourastie described a regular sequence: a poor economy is primary, dominated by agriculture; as income rises, the share of agriculture falls and manufacturing rises; and at higher incomes manufacturing's share falls and services rise. The mechanism was given in [Income Elasticity, Cross Elasticity and What Elasticity Is For]: Engel's law says the share of income spent on food falls as income rises, so demand moves towards manufactures and then towards services. Rising agricultural productivity releases workers, and the factories absorb them.
What India actually did. The share of agriculture in output fell as expected. The share of manufacturing did not rise to take its place. Services rose instead, and rose early. And employment stayed in agriculture far longer than output did.
The evidence
Shares of nominal gross value added at basic prices, computed from Table 1.4 of the Statistical Appendix to the Economic Survey 2025-26, with the Appendix's own grouping. Note that the Appendix puts mining with agriculture, and construction, electricity, gas and water supply with manufacturing.
| Year | Agriculture, forestry, fishing, mining | Manufacturing, construction, electricity, gas, water | Services, the three remaining groups |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950-51 | about 54 per cent | about 15 per cent | about 36 per cent |
| 1970-71 | about 44 per cent | about 22 per cent | about 38 per cent |
| 1990-91 | about 33 per cent | about 27 per cent | about 41 per cent |
| 2000-01 | about 26 per cent | about 27 per cent | about 47 per cent |
| 2010-11 | about 22 per cent | about 30 per cent | about 49 per cent |
| 2020-21 | about 22 per cent | about 26 per cent | about 52 per cent |
| 2025-26 (First AE) | about 18 per cent | about 25 per cent | about 56 per cent |
Three things to read off that table in an answer.
- Agriculture's share fell by two thirds, from about 54 per cent to about 18 per cent, over seventy five years.
- Industry's share peaked around 2010-11 and has not grown since. It was about 15 per cent in 1950-51, reached about 30 per cent by 2010-11, and is about 25 per cent now. In an economy following the classical path it should still be rising.
- Services took the whole of the gap. From about 36 per cent to about 56 per cent, and most of the rise came after 1990.
The rest of this chapter
Module one is free. The rest of B.L.S. LL.B. 5 Years Semester 1 is part of the bundle.
You are reading a chapter from a later module. Everything in module one of every subject stays free, and so does every question paper and the syllabus.
See the semester for ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in
Free either way: question papers, the syllabus, and module one of every subject.
The rest of this subject
These notes are cut from the University's printed syllabus. Open the syllabus itself, or the past papers, for the same subject.