munotes®

Attendance of Persons Confined in Prison

Chapter Forty-Six

Syllabus topic 3.1, "Mode of Taking Evidence and General Provisions as to Inquiries and Trials - Section 266 to 352"

Pages 301 to 305 of 699

In one line

A court that needs a person who is in prison, either as an accused or as a witness, orders the officer in charge of the prison to produce him, and this Chapter says when that order must be obeyed and when it must not.

In exam wording: section 302 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 empowers a Criminal Court, where it appears that a person confined or detained in a prison should be brought before it to answer a charge or for any proceeding against him, or that it is necessary for the ends of justice to examine him as a witness, to order the officer in charge of the prison to produce him.

Why the law has this at all

Because a prisoner cannot come to court by himself, and because letting every court order any prisoner out at will would be a security problem.

So the Code balances the two. The order is a judicial one, made by a Criminal Court in a proceeding before it. But a second class Magistrate's order needs countersigning by his Chief Judicial Magistrate, who may refuse. The Government may keep a named person or class of persons in, on stated grounds. And the officer in charge of the prison must himself refuse in four defined situations, giving the court his reasons.

Some words this chapter uses

Detained, by section 301(a), includes detained under any law providing for preventive detention. So a person held without trial under a preventive detention law is within the Chapter.

Prison, by section 301(b), includes any place declared by the State Government to be a subsidiary jail, and any reformatory, Borstal institution or other institution of a like nature.

Countersigning is the Chief Judicial Magistrate's endorsement, which a second class Magistrate's order needs before it has effect.

Section 302: the order

Sub-section (1). Whenever, in the course of an inquiry, trial or proceeding under the Sanhita, it appears to a Criminal Court:

(a) that a person confined or detained in a prison should be brought before the Court for answering to a charge of an offence, or for the purpose of any proceedings against him; or (b) that it is necessary for the ends of justice to examine such person as a witness,

the Court may make an order requiring the officer in charge of the prison to produce him.

So there are two grounds and they are quite different: the prisoner as accused, and the prisoner as witness. Only the second carries the "necessary for the ends of justice" test.

Sub-section (2), the countersignature. Where the order is made by a Magistrate of the second class, it shall not be forwarded to, or acted upon by, the officer in charge of the prison unless it is countersigned by the Chief Judicial Magistrate to whom that Magistrate is subordinate.

munotes.in301

Attendance of Persons Confined in Prison

Sub-section (3). Every order submitted for countersigning shall be accompanied by a statement of the facts which, in the Magistrate's opinion, render the order necessary, and the Chief Judicial Magistrate may, after considering that statement, decline to countersign.

Section 303: the Government's power to keep him in

Sub-section (1). The State Government, or the Central Government in cases instituted by its central agency, may at any time, by general or special order, direct that any person or class of persons shall not be removed from the prison in which they are confined or detained. So long as that order is in force, no order under section 302, whether made before or after it, has effect in respect of them.

Sub-section (2), the matters it must consider first.

(a) the nature of the offence for which, or the grounds on which, the person or class has been ordered to be confined or detained; (b) the likelihood of disturbance of public order if he or they are allowed to be removed; and (c) the public interest, generally.

Notice what section 303 does and does not do. It does not overrule the court on the merits of the case. It removes the physical production of a prisoner, on security grounds, and the court must then look to another way of taking his evidence, for example a commission under section 306 or audio-video electronic means.

Section 304: when the jailer must refuse

Where the person named in a section 302 order:

(a) is, by reason of sickness or infirmity, unfit to be removed from the prison; or (b) is under committal for trial, or under remand pending trial, or pending a preliminary investigation; or (c) is in custody for a period which would expire before the time required for complying with the order and taking him back; or (d) is a person to whom a section 303 order applies,

the officer in charge of the prison shall abstain from carrying out the Court's order and shall send to the Court a statement of the reasons for so abstaining.

The proviso, and it is the detail most often missed. Where the attendance of the person is required for giving evidence at a place not more than twenty-five kilometres from the prison, the officer shall not abstain for the reason in clause (b).

So a prisoner who is himself on remand can still be produced as a witness if the court is within twenty-five kilometres.

munotes.in302

Attendance of Persons Confined in Prison

Sections 305 and 306: production, and the alternative

Section 305. Subject to section 304, the officer in charge of the prison shall, on delivery of a section 302 order duly countersigned where necessary, cause the person named to be taken to the Court so as to be present at the time mentioned in the order, and shall cause him to be kept in custody in or near the Court until he has been examined or until the Court authorises his return.

Section 306, the commission. The provisions of this Chapter are without prejudice to the power of the Court to issue, under section 319, a commission for the examination as a witness of any person confined or detained in a prison; and Part B of Chapter XXV applies to the examination on commission of such a person in the prison as it applies to any other person.

Section 306 is the safety valve, and its drafting is worth noticing: it does not create a new power. It says the production machinery in this Chapter takes nothing away from the ordinary commission power in section 319. So where section 303 or section 304 stops the prisoner coming, or the journey is not worth making, his evidence is taken where he is, on the same terms as anybody else's.

A worked example

A Sessions Court at Nagpur is trying a case in which a material witness, Suresh, is serving a sentence in Amravati Central Prison.

What does the Court do? It makes an order under section 302(1)(b) requiring the officer in charge to produce Suresh, being satisfied that his examination is necessary for the ends of justice.

Change the court. The order is made by a second class Magistrate. It cannot be forwarded to or acted upon by the jailer unless the Chief Judicial Magistrate countersigns it, section 302(2), and it must be sent up with a statement of the facts that make it necessary. The Chief Judicial Magistrate may decline, section 302(3).

Suresh is unwell and unfit to travel. The officer shall abstain from producing him and shall send the Court a statement of his reasons, section 304(a).

Suresh is not a convict but is himself on remand pending his own trial. Clause (b) would normally require the jailer to abstain. But the Court is eighteen kilometres away, so the proviso applies and he shall not abstain on that ground.

The State Government has ordered that Suresh not be removed, having regard to the nature of his offence, the likelihood of a disturbance of public order and the public interest. Then no section 302 order has effect, whether made before or after the Government's order, section 303(1). The Court's route is now a commission under section 306.

munotes.in303

Attendance of Persons Confined in Prison

Suresh's sentence expires in six days and the journey and return would take ten. Clause (c) applies and the jailer abstains.

Suresh is produced. He is kept in custody in or near the Court until examined or until the Court authorises his return, section 305.

Distinctions

Section 302(1)(a)Section 302(1)(b)
The prisoner is wanted asAn accused, to answer a charge or for proceedings against himA witness
TestThat he should be brought before the CourtThat it is necessary for the ends of justice to examine him
Ground on which the jailer abstains, section 304Overridden by the 25 km proviso
(a) sickness or infirmityNo
(b) committal, remand, or pending preliminary investigationYes, where he is wanted to give evidence within twenty-five kilometres
(c) custody expiring before the journey can be completedNo
(d) a section 303 Government orderNo
Section 303Section 304
Who decidesThe State or Central GovernmentThe officer in charge of the prison
BasisNature of the offence, likely disturbance of public order, public interestFour defined contingencies
EffectNo section 302 order has effectThe officer abstains and reports his reasons to the Court

What this does NOT mean

Section 303 is not a power to stop a prosecution. It stops removal from prison, and section 306 leaves the Court a way of taking the evidence.

Section 304 is not a discretion. In each of the four contingencies the officer shall abstain, and shall report his reasons.

The twenty-five kilometre proviso does not cure the other three grounds. It operates only on clause (b), and only where the person is wanted for giving evidence.

And "prison" is wider than a jail. Section 301(b) includes a subsidiary jail, a reformatory, a Borstal institution and any institution of a like nature.

Quick revision

  • 301: detained includes preventive detention; prison includes a subsidiary jail, reformatory, Borstal institution or like institution.
  • 302(1): a Criminal Court may order production of a prisoner as an accused, or as a witness where necessary for the ends of justice.
  • 302(2) and (3): a second class Magistrate's order needs the Chief Judicial Magistrate's countersignature, on a statement of the facts, and he may decline.
  • 303: the State or Central Government may direct that a person or class not be removed, having regard to the nature of the offence, the likelihood of disturbance of public order and the public interest; no section 302 order then has effect.
  • 304: the officer shall abstain and report reasons where the person is unfit through sickness or infirmity, is under committal, remand or pending preliminary investigation, is in custody expiring before the journey can be completed, or is covered by a section 303 order. Proviso: not for the second ground where evidence is to be given within twenty-five kilometres.
  • 305: on a valid order, the prisoner is produced at the time stated and kept in custody in or near the Court until examined or released by the Court.
  • 306: this Chapter is without prejudice to the power to issue a commission under section 319, and Part B of Chapter XXV applies to a prisoner's examination on commission as to anybody else's.
munotes.in304

Attendance of Persons Confined in Prison

Test yourself

1. On what two grounds may a Court order a prisoner to be produced? That he should be brought before the Court to answer a charge or for proceedings against him; or that it is necessary for the ends of justice to examine him as a witness, section 302(1).

2. What is special about an order made by a second class Magistrate? It has no effect unless countersigned by the Chief Judicial Magistrate to whom he is subordinate, and it must be submitted with a statement of the facts rendering it necessary, which the Chief Judicial Magistrate may consider and decline to countersign, section 302(2) and (3).

3. On what matters must the Government have regard before ordering that a prisoner not be removed? The nature of the offence or the grounds of detention, the likelihood of disturbance of public order if he is removed, and the public interest generally, section 303(2).

4. Name the four situations in which the jailer must not carry out the order. Sickness or infirmity making him unfit to be removed; being under committal for trial or under remand pending trial or a preliminary investigation; being in custody for a period expiring before the order could be complied with and the return made; and being covered by a Government order under section 303.

5. What is the effect of the twenty-five kilometre proviso? Where the person's attendance is required for giving evidence at a place not more than twenty-five kilometres from the prison, the officer shall not abstain on the ground that he is under committal, remand or a pending preliminary investigation.

6. What can a Court do where a prisoner cannot be produced? Issue a commission for his examination as a witness under section 319. Section 306 preserves that power expressly, providing that this Chapter is without prejudice to it and that Part B of Chapter XXV applies to a prisoner as it does to anybody else.

7. Does "prison" mean only a jail? No. Section 301(b) includes any place declared a subsidiary jail by the State Government, and any reformatory, Borstal institution or other institution of a like nature.

munotes.in305

The rest of this subject

These notes are cut from the University's printed syllabus. Open the syllabus itself, or the past papers, for the same subject.

Report or request
Done!