KSLU Solved Question Papers
Constitutional Law Theory and Practice
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LL.M. (Two Years) · Sem 1
2015 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Constitutional Law Theory and Practice
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LL.M. (Two Years) · Sem 1
2015 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 2 November 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2015 Dec examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2015 Dec examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2015 Dec examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 80 · 20 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Unit I
Answer
For full marks, cover: what a constitution is and the four jobs it does; why "complete" means more than "written"; the essentials, each with its Indian provision: a source of authority (the Preamble), declared aims (In re Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves; Kesavananda Bharati), organs constituted, power divided between organs and between levels (Ram Jawaya Kapur; article 246), rights that limit power (articles 13, 32), an independent judiciary with judicial review (Minerva Mills), supremacy, a balanced amending procedure (article 368), emergency powers with safeguards, and institutions of accountability; form (clarity, length, language); constitutionalism as the final test; a table; and a conclusion.
A constitution is the body of fundamental rules that sets up the institutions of government. It distributes power among them, regulates the relation between the State and the individual, and provides how those rules may be changed. Every constitution does four jobs: it constitutes the organs, distributes power, limits power and provides for its own change.
A constitution is complete when it does all four jobs, does them clearly and is actually obeyed. A written text that leaves out one of the jobs, or that the rulers ignore, is incomplete however long it is.
1. A source of authority. A complete constitution says where its own authority comes from. The Indian Preamble records that "WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA" adopt, enact and give the Constitution to themselves. The Constituent Assembly adopted it on 26 November 1949. Authority rests on the people, not on a ruler or a foreign Parliament.
2. Declared aims and values. The Preamble states the goals of justice, liberty, equality and fraternity. In In re Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves, decided on 14 March 1960, the Court called the Preamble a key to the mind of the makers. It held, however, that the Preamble was not part of the Constitution. In Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461, the Court held that it is part of the Constitution and a guide to its interpretation.
3. The organs constituted. It must create the legislature, the executive and the judiciary and say how each is composed. Articles 79 (Parliament), 52 and 74 (the President and the Council of Ministers) and 124 (the Supreme Court) do this in India.
4. Power divided between the organs. No organ should hold all power. India adopts a functional separation with checks and balances. In Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab, AIR 1955 SC 549, the Court held that the Constitution does not adopt the doctrine in its absolute rigidity. The functions of the organs are, however, sufficiently differentiated.
5. Power divided between levels. In a large and diverse country, a complete constitution also divides power between the centre and the regions. Article 246 and the three Lists of the Seventh Schedule do this in India.
6. Rights that limit power. A complete constitution guarantees rights that the State cannot override by ordinary law. Part III does this, and article 13(2) makes void any law that takes away or abridges those rights. Article 32 makes the right to approach the Supreme Court itself a fundamental right.
7. An independent judiciary and judicial review. Rights and limits are worthless without a body that can enforce them. Security of tenure for judges (article 124(4)) and judicial review give that protection. In Minerva Mills Ltd v. Union of India, AIR 1980 SC 1789, the Court struck down clauses (4) and (5) of article 368. Those clauses tried to exclude judicial review of amendments and to make the amending power unlimited. A limited power cannot be made unlimited by removing the means of enforcing the limit.
8. Supremacy. The constitution must stand above ordinary law. Parliament and the State Legislatures make laws "subject to the provisions of this Constitution" (article 245). A law that conflicts with it is void to that extent.
9. A balanced procedure for amendment. A constitution that cannot change will break, and one that changes too easily gives no security. Article 368 strikes a balance. Most amendments need a special majority in each House. Amendments touching federal matters also need ratification by at least half of the State Legislatures. Kesavananda Bharati added an implied limit: the basic structure cannot be destroyed.
10. Emergency powers with safeguards. A complete constitution plans for crisis without handing over unlimited power. Part XVIII provides for national, State and financial emergencies. After the Emergency of 1975 to 1977, the Forty-fourth Amendment of 1978 tightened the safeguards. It replaced "internal disturbance" with "armed rebellion" and protected articles 20 and 21 from suspension.
11. Institutions of accountability and representation. Free elections, an independent Election Commission (article 324) and a Comptroller and Auditor-General (article 148) keep the government answerable. Citizenship rules (Part II) say who belongs to the political community.
A document may contain every essential and still fail. The Soviet Constitution of 1936 listed many rights, yet none could be enforced against the ruling party. It was a constitution without constitutionalism. Completeness therefore includes a political culture that respects limits. The Indian Constitution meets the test through enforceable rights, judicial review and regular elections.
| Essential | Purpose | Indian provision or case |
|---|---|---|
| Source of authority | Legitimacy | Preamble: "WE, THE PEOPLE" |
| Declared aims | Direction and interpretation | Preamble; Berubari; Kesavananda |
| Organs and separation | No concentration of power | Articles 52, 74, 79, 124; Ram Jawaya Kapur |
| Federal division | Unity with diversity | Article 246; Seventh Schedule |
| Rights and review | Limits on power | Articles 13, 32; Minerva Mills |
| Amendment | Stability with change | Article 368; basic structure |
| Emergency safeguards | Survival without tyranny | Part XVIII; Forty-fourth Amendment |
Conclusion. A complete constitution creates the organs of government and divides and limits their power. It protects rights through an independent judiciary and provides for its own orderly change. It also states its source of authority and its aims, and prepares for emergencies with safeguards. The Indian Constitution contains all these essentials, and Kesavananda Bharati and Minerva Mills protect them even against amendment. Completeness, finally, depends on practice: a text is complete only when those who govern are actually bound by it.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free, and so does the syllabus.
What should we fix or add?
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.