KSLU Solved Question Papers
Law of Taxation
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LL.B. (Three Years) · Sem 3
2015 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Law of Taxation
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
LL.B. (Three Years) · Sem 3
2015 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 24 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2015 Dec examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2015 Dec examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2015 Dec examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 13 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: why agricultural income is outside Union income tax (List I entry 82, List II entry 46); the definition in section 2(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and its limbs; the meaning of "agriculture" (Raja Benoy Kumar Sahas Roy); what is and is not agricultural income (Bacha F. Guzdar); exemption under section 10(1); composite income of tea, coffee and rubber; partial integration with a worked example; the Income-tax Act, 2025 (section 2(5), Schedule II).
Parliament's power to tax income comes from entry 82 of List I: "Taxes on income other than agricultural income". Taxes on agricultural income belong to the States under entry 46 of List II. So the Union's income tax cannot touch agricultural income. The Income-tax Act therefore defines it carefully and exempts it.
Agricultural income has four limbs under section 2(1A) of the 1961 Act:
Two exclusions apply. Gain on transferring urban agricultural land, which is a capital asset under section 2(14)(iii), is not agricultural income (Explanation 1). Rural agricultural land is not a capital asset at all. Nor is income from using a farm building for another purpose, such as letting it as a hostel (Explanation 2).
Income from a farm building is agricultural only if the proviso to section 2(1A)(c) is met:
"Outside urban limits" means outside any municipality or cantonment with a population of ten thousand or more. It also means beyond an aerial distance set by the town's population. The distance is 2 kilometres from a town of up to one lakh, and 6 kilometres from a town of up to ten lakh. It is 8 kilometres from a larger town. Population is taken from the last census published before the year begins (Explanation 4).
The Act does not define agriculture. Commissioner of Income-tax v. Raja Benoy Kumar Sahas Roy, AIR 1957 SC 768, decided on 23 May 1957, supplies the meaning. The assessee owned about 6,000 acres of forest of sal trees, about 150 years old, of spontaneous growth. Parts had been cut down and replanted, and his staff pruned, weeded, guarded and sowed seed there. He claimed his income from selling trees as agricultural income.
The Supreme Court held that agriculture means the basic operations on the land itself, involving human skill and labour: tilling, sowing and planting. Subsequent operations, like weeding, pruning and harvesting, count only if basic operations were done first. So the produce of a forest of spontaneous growth is not agricultural income. Income from the replanted areas was agricultural. Dairy farming, poultry and breeding livestock are not agriculture.
The case gives the test examiners expect. First ask whether there were basic operations on the land. Then ask whether the income comes from that land. A claim that fails either question is taxed as ordinary income. The person claiming exemption must prove the facts that bring the income within section 2(1A), since an exemption is for the taxpayer to establish.
Bacha F. Guzdar v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay, AIR 1955 SC 74. Mrs. Guzdar held shares in tea companies whose income was 60 per cent agricultural. She claimed that 60 per cent of her dividends was exempt agricultural income. The Supreme Court disagreed. A shareholder gets no interest in the company's land; she only shares profits when they are distributed. So a dividend is not agricultural income, however the company earned it.
| Receipt | Agricultural income? |
|---|---|
| Rent from paddy land in Mandya | Yes |
| Sale of sugarcane grown by the farmer | Yes |
| Income from a nursery selling saplings | Yes |
| Income from agricultural land in Sri Lanka | No: land not in India |
| Income from dairy or poultry farming | No (Benoy Kumar) |
| Dividend from a tea company | No (Bacha F. Guzdar) |
| Receipt | Agricultural income? |
|---|---|
| Sugar made by a factory from cane it buys | No: business income |
| Gain on sale of urban agricultural land | No: a capital gain |
1. Exemption. Under section 10(1) of the 1961 Act, agricultural income is not included in total income.
2. Composite income. Some crops are grown and also manufactured by the same person. The Rules split the income into a business part and an agricultural part:
| Income from | Business (taxable) | Agricultural (exempt) |
|---|---|---|
| Tea grown and manufactured by the seller | 40 per cent | 60 per cent |
| Coffee grown and cured by the seller | 25 per cent | 75 per cent |
| Coffee grown, cured, roasted and ground | 40 per cent | 60 per cent |
| Rubber grown and processed into latex or crepe | 35 per cent | 65 per cent |
These came from rules 8, 7B and 7A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, and are now in rule 271 of the 2026 Rules.
3. Partial integration. The annual Finance Act uses agricultural income to fix the rate on other income. It applies to individuals, Hindu undivided families and similar persons where net agricultural income exceeds Rs 5,000 and other income exceeds the basic exemption limit.
Sachin, aged 45, has a salary income of Rs 7,00,000 and net agricultural income of Rs 2,00,000. He is in the old regime, with a basic exemption limit of Rs 2,50,000.
| Step | Rs |
|---|---|
| X: tax on Rs 9,00,000 (nil on 2.5 lakh, 5 per cent on 2.5 lakh, 20 per cent on 4 lakh) | 92,500 |
| Y: tax on Rs 4,50,000 (nil on 2.5 lakh, 5 per cent on 2 lakh) | 10,000 |
| Step | Rs |
|---|---|
| Tax on salary income (X minus Y) | 82,500 |
| Add: 4 per cent cess | 3,300 |
| Tax payable | 85,800 |
Without partial integration, tax on Rs 7,00,000 alone would be Rs 52,500 before cess. The farm income is not taxed, but it pushes the salary into higher slabs.
From 1 April 2026 the definition is in section 2(5) of the 2025 Act, with nursery saplings in the body of the definition. The exemption is in Schedule II, Table, Sl. No. 1, through section 11. Partial integration continues under the Finance Act, 2026, with the new regime's limit of Rs 4 lakh in place of Rs 2.5 lakh.
Conclusion. Agricultural income is rent or revenue from land in India used for agriculture, and income from cultivating it and selling or processing its produce. Farm building income and nursery income are included. Under Benoy Kumar it needs basic operations on the land. Under Bacha F. Guzdar it keeps its character only in the hands of the person who derives it from the land. It is exempt under section 10(1), now Schedule II of the 2025 Act, because only the States may tax it. Through partial integration it still raises the rate of tax on the person's other income.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free, and so does the syllabus.
What should we fix or add?
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.