KSLU Solved Question Papers
Penology and Victimology
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 9
2024 Aug Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Penology and Victimology
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 9
2024 Aug Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2024 Aug examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2024 Aug examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2024 Aug examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 80 · 20 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Unit I
Answer
For full marks, cover: a definition of punishment (Grotius, and the lawful-authority test); the ancient concept in primitive society, the codes of Hammurabi and Moses, Greece and Rome; the ancient Indian concept of danda, its four forms, its limits and prayaschitta; the features of the ancient concept; the modern concept under Indian law (BNS s.4, Article 20, reform, alternatives, a narrowed death penalty) with Mohammad Giasuddin and Bachan Singh; a comparison table.
Punishment is the suffering or loss that the State deliberately imposes on a person because he has committed an offence. The Dutch jurist Hugo Grotius described it as an evil of suffering inflicted for an evil of action.
Three things make a hardship a punishment in law.
Indian law states the permitted punishments. Section 4 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS) lists death, imprisonment for life, imprisonment (rigorous or simple), forfeiture of property, fine and community service. It replaced section 53 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (IPC), which had no community service.
In the earliest societies there was no State to punish. A wrong was a private matter between families.
In ancient India punishment was danda, which means the rod. The sources are the Dharmasastra, mainly the Manusmriti, the Yajnavalkya Smriti and the Narada Smriti. Kautilya's Arthasastra, a manual of statecraft, is the other main source.
Imprisonment was not a main punishment in ancient India. Prisons held people only until trial or execution. Fines were the commonest penalty, and the Arthasastra set them out like a price list.
The modern concept grew from the eighteenth century reformers. Beccaria argued in 1764 that certainty of punishment deters more than its severity. Its main features in India today are these.
Mohammad Giasuddin v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (1977) 3 SCC 287. The accused cheated unemployed young men by promising them jobs. He was a first offender, about twenty-eight, and supported elderly parents. The Supreme Court said punishment should be a process of re-shaping a person who has slipped into crime. It wanted a therapeutic, not a terror, outlook in criminal courts. It reduced his prison term and ordered him to pay a fine to be made over to the victims. The case states the modern, reformative concept.
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab, (1980) 2 SCC 684. A Constitution Bench upheld the death penalty for murder. It held that life imprisonment is the rule and death the exception. Death may be given only in the rarest of rare cases, when the alternative is unquestionably foreclosed. The ancient world killed freely; modern law kills, if at all, only as a last resort.
| Point | Ancient concept | Modern concept |
|---|---|---|
| Who punishes | The victim's family, later the king | The State alone, through courts |
| Main idea | Revenge, retribution, expiation | Prevention, proportion, reform |
| Usual penalty | Fine, mutilation, death, banishment | Imprisonment, fine, probation, community service |
| Equality | Graded by rank or varna | Equal law for all (Article 14) |
| Prison | Only to hold a person | The main punishment |
| The offender | An object of punishment | A person with rights, who can reform |
Conclusion. Punishment is suffering that the State lawfully imposes for an offence after a fair trial. In ancient times it began as private revenge and was then limited by talion and composition. In India it took the form of the king's danda, with penance alongside. The modern concept keeps punishment within section 4 of the BNS and Article 20. It aims at prevention and reform, as Mohammad Giasuddin shows, and keeps death for the rarest of rare cases after Bachan Singh.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.