KSLU Solved Question Papers
Intellectual Property Rights I
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 9
2016 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Intellectual Property Rights I
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 9
2016 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2016 Dec examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2016 Dec examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2016 Dec examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 13 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: Part A, the meaning of grant: when a patent is granted (section 43(1)); publication and inspection (section 43(2)); the date of the patent (section 45); form, extent and one invention (section 46); what the grant confers (section 48) and what it does not guarantee (section 13(4); Bilcare); Part B, how the grant may be restricted: (1) the conditions of every grant in section 47 (Government use of articles and processes, experiment and research including teaching, Government import of medicines; compare Pfizer Corporation v. Ministry of Health); (2) restrictions before grant: refusal for exclusions (sections 3, 4; Novartis), amendment or refusal after examination (section 15), anticipation and prior claiming (section 18), potential infringement (section 19), secrecy directions (sections 35 to 37), pre-grant opposition (section 25(1)), abandonment and withdrawal (sections 9(1), 11B(4), 21); (3) restrictions after grant: post-grant opposition (section 25(2)), revocation (sections 64 to 66), compulsory licences and Government use (sections 84, 92, 100), the term (section 53); a table; the conclusion.
Section 43(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 governs grant. A patent is granted when the application is found in order, and has not been refused or found to contravene the Act. The patent is then granted as quickly as possible to the applicant, or jointly to joint applicants, under the seal of the patent office. The date of grant is entered in the register.
On grant, the Controller publishes the fact. The application, specification and related documents then become open to public inspection (section 43(2)).
The patentee may prevent others, without his consent, from making, using, offering for sale, selling or importing the patented product in India. For a process, he may prevent its use and dealings in the product obtained directly from it. Section 48 begins: "Subject to the other provisions contained in this Act and the conditions specified in section 47". So the grant is limited from the start.
Examination does not warrant the validity of any patent (section 13(4)). In Bilcare Ltd v. Amartara Pvt Ltd, 2007 (34) PTC 419 (Del), the patentee of a packaging film sought an interim injunction. The defendant challenged the patent's validity. The Delhi High Court refused the injunction, because a recently granted patent carries no presumption of validity under section 13(4).
Every patent is granted subject to four conditions.
1. Government use of articles (section 47(1)). The Government may import or make a patented machine, apparatus or article, merely for its own use. The same applies to an article made by a patented process.
2. Government use of processes (section 47(2)). A patented process may be used by or on behalf of the Government, merely for its own use.
3. Experiment, research and teaching (section 47(3)). Any person may make or use a patented article, or use a patented process, merely for experiment or research. This includes imparting instructions to pupils. So a university may test an invention and a teacher may demonstrate it.
4. Medicines for public institutions (section 47(4)). The Government may import a patented medicine or drug merely for its own use. It may also distribute it in dispensaries, hospitals and medical institutions run by it, or notified by the Central Government for their public service.
Why these conditions exist. They balance the private monopoly against public needs: government functions, the progress of science and public health. The idea is old. In Pfizer Corporation v. Ministry of Health, [1965] AC 512, the British Minister of Health arranged for a patented antibiotic to be supplied to public hospitals. The House of Lords held this was use for the services of the Crown, which the patentee could not stop.
The limit of section 47. These uses are free, but narrow. They must be "merely" for the Government's own use, or for research or teaching. Wider Government use, such as supplying the public, falls under Chapter XVII (sections 99 to 103), where the patentee must be paid.
1. Things that are not inventions (section 3), and atomic energy (section 4). No patent is granted for these at all.
Section 3(d) has proved important. In Novartis AG v. Union of India, (2013) 6 SCC 1, Novartis sought a patent for the beta crystalline form of imatinib mesylate, sold as Glivec. The application was refused after pre-grant oppositions. The Supreme Court upheld the refusal. A new form of a known substance must show enhanced therapeutic efficacy, which Novartis had not proved.
2. Refusal or required amendment (section 15). If the application or specification does not comply with the Act, the Controller may refuse it, or require it to be amended.
3. Anticipation and prior claiming (section 18). Where the invention has been anticipated, the Controller may refuse the application unless the applicant shows an earlier priority date or amends the specification. Where another specification claims it, he may insert a reference to that specification.
4. Potential infringement (section 19). The invention may be impossible to work without a substantial risk of infringing another patent's claim. The Controller may then insert a reference to that patent in the specification, as notice to the public.
5. Secrecy directions (sections 35 to 37). For an invention relevant for defence, the application may proceed up to grant, but no patent is granted while the direction lasts.
6. Pre-grant opposition (section 25(1)). Any person may oppose on grounds such as wrongful obtaining, anticipation, obviousness, insufficiency or non-disclosure of the source of biological material. The Controller may then refuse the grant or require amendment.
7. Abandonment and withdrawal. The application is deemed abandoned if the complete specification is not filed within twelve months of a provisional (section 9(1)). It is also deemed abandoned if not put in order for grant within the prescribed time (section 21). It is treated as withdrawn if examination is not requested in time (section 11B(4)).
| Stage | Restriction | Sections |
|---|---|---|
| Every grant | Government use, research and teaching, medicines | 47 |
| Before grant | Exclusions; refusal or amendment; anticipation; references; secrecy; opposition; abandonment | 3, 4, 9, 11B, 15, 18, 19, 21, 25(1), 35 to 37 |
| After grant | Opposition; revocation; licences; Government use; term | 25(2), 53, 64 to 66, 84, 92, 100 |
Conclusion. A patent is granted under seal when the application is in order and not refused (section 43). It is dated from filing, has effect throughout India and covers one invention (sections 45, 46). It confers the rights in section 48, but does not guarantee validity (section 13(4); Bilcare). Every grant is subject to the conditions of section 47: free Government use, research and teaching, and import of medicines for public institutions. That balance is long recognised (Pfizer Corporation v. Ministry of Health). Before grant, the patent may be refused or limited for exclusions (Novartis), anticipation, potential infringement, secrecy or opposition. After grant, it remains open to opposition, revocation and compulsory licences.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.