KSLU Solved Question Papers
Insurance Law
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 8
2015 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Insurance Law
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 8
2015 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2015 Dec examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2015 Dec examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2015 Dec examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 80 · 20 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: risk sharing in ancient India; British and Indian companies (1818, 1870, 1906); the statutes of 1912, 1928 and 1938; nationalisation of life insurance (1956) and general insurance (1971 and 1972); Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union of India; the Malhotra Committee and the IRDA Act, 1999; reopening and foreign investment (26, 49, 74 and 100 per cent); the 2015 and 2025 amendments; the General Insurance Corporation as re-insurer; a timeline.
India shared risk long before it had insurance companies. The joint family spread the cost of a death or illness across the household. Village and caste funds met the cost of funerals and disasters. Merchants shared commercial risk through guilds and the hundi system. Texts such as the Manusmriti and the Arthasastra discuss pooling losses and rates on risky loans. But there was no insurer carrying risk as a business for a premium.
Life insurance, 1956. Many life offices failed, and policyholders lost their savings. The State also wanted long-term savings for development. The Central Government took over management by Ordinance on 19 January 1956. The Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 then vested the life business of every insurer in the new Life Insurance Corporation of India.
General insurance, 1971 and 1972. The General Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971 placed the management of general insurers with the Government. The General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 then took over the business of one hundred and seven insurers. It vested them in four companies held by the General Insurance Corporation of India: the National, New India, Oriental and United India.
The constitutional limit. Nationalisation must respect property rights and pay fair compensation. In Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union of India, (1970) 1 SCC 248, the Supreme Court struck down the bank nationalisation law because its compensation was not just. The LIC Act paid compensation on the principles in its First Schedule, and a Tribunal settled disputes (sections 16 and 17). The 1972 Act paid the fixed amounts set out in its Schedule (section 11).
The public duty. In Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Consumer Education and Research Centre, (1995) 5 SCC 482, the Court held the nationalised insurer an instrumentality of the State. It could not confine its cheapest policy to employees of Government bodies and reputed firms.
| Year | Event |
|---|---|
| 1818 | Oriental Life, Calcutta |
| 1906 | National Insurance Company |
| 1912 and 1938 | First statute; the Insurance Act |
| 1956 | Life insurance nationalised |
| 1972 | General insurance nationalised |
| 1999 and 2000 | IRDA Act; private insurers return |
| 2026 | Foreign holding up to 100 per cent |
Conclusion. Insurance in India moved from family and caste risk sharing to British and Indian companies in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It was brought under the Insurance Act, 1938 and nationalised in 1956 (life) and 1972 (general). From 2000 it was reopened to private and foreign insurers under the IRDA Act, 1999, with foreign holding now up to one hundred per cent. Nationalisation was bounded by the Constitution (Rustom Cavasjee Cooper), and the State insurer's duty to the public is enforceable (Consumer Education and Research Centre).
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.