KSLU Solved Question Papers
Human Rights Law and Practice
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 8
2020 Nov Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Human Rights Law and Practice
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 8
2020 Nov Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2020 Nov examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2020 Nov examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2020 Nov examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 13 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the meaning of human rights (the idea and section 2(1)(d) of the Protection of Human Rights Act 1993); the development in India in phases: (1) ancient India, duties of the ruler under dharma (Kautilya, Ashoka); (2) medieval India (justice as legitimacy, Akbar, the Bhakti and Sufi movements); (3) social reform in the nineteenth century (1829, 1856); (4) the demand for a bill of rights (1895, 1925, 1928, 1931; none in the Government of India Act 1935); (5) the Constituent Assembly and the Constitution (Parts III and IV; Hansa Mehta); (6) the courts after 1950 (Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, the Forty-fourth Amendment, Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, public interest litigation, Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India); (7) treaties and statutes (Covenants 1979, CRC 1992, CEDAW 1993; the 1993 Act and later laws); a table of milestones; an assessment.
Human rights are the rights every person has because he or she is a human being. They protect life, liberty, equality and dignity, and they belong to all without distinction of caste, religion, sex or wealth.
Indian law defines them in section 2(1)(d) of the Protection of Human Rights Act 1993. They are "the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in the International Covenants and enforceable by courts in India". The definition joins the Constitution and international law, which is how the law developed in India.
Ancient India expressed its ideas as the duty of the ruler, not as the right of the subject. The king was bound by dharma, the law of right conduct, and a king who ruled against it lost the ground of his authority.
But the subject had no right he could enforce in a court, and the varna order made duties and punishments depend on birth.
Reformers fought for rights before the word was used. Raja Ram Mohan Roy's campaign led to the ban on sati by Bengal Regulation XVII of 1829. Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar's campaign led to the Hindu Widows' Remarriage Act 1856. Jyotirao and Savitribai Phule opened schools for girls and for children of oppressed castes.
Indians demanded written rights decades before independence.
The British refused. The Government of India Act 1935 contained no bill of rights.
The Constituent Assembly met from December 1946. Its Advisory Committee on Fundamental Rights was chaired by Sardar Patel. At the same time India took part in drafting the Universal Declaration. Its delegate Hansa Mehta secured the words "all human beings" in Article 1. The Declaration was adopted on 10 December 1948 and the Constitution on 26 November 1949.
The Constitution came into force on 26 January 1950. It placed civil and political rights in Part III as enforceable Fundamental Rights. Article 32 gave the right to move the Supreme Court to enforce them. It placed economic and social rights in Part IV as Directive Principles, which Article 37 makes unenforceable but fundamental in governance. The split follows the Karachi Resolution.
| Year | Step |
|---|---|
| 1829, 1856 | Sati banned; widow remarriage allowed |
| 1895 to 1931 | Indian drafts of a bill of rights; Karachi Resolution |
| 1950 | Constitution: Parts III and IV |
| 1973 | Kesavananda Bharati: basic structure |
| 1976 to 1978 | ADM Jabalpur; the Forty-fourth Amendment |
| 1978 | Maneka Gandhi: fair procedure |
| 1979 | India accedes to the two Covenants |
| 1993 | Protection of Human Rights Act; CEDAW ratified |
| 2017 | Puttaswamy: privacy; ADM Jabalpur overruled |
India's human rights law grew from Indian demands and then joined international law. Its strengths are a strong Part III, an active Supreme Court and a statutory Commission. Its weaknesses are delay in the courts, preventive detention under Article 22, and Commissions that can only recommend.
Conclusion. Human rights are the inherent rights of every person, defined in India by section 2(1)(d) of the 1993 Act. In India they developed from the ruler's duty under dharma and the reformers' struggles to the bills of rights of 1895 to 1931. They became Parts III and IV of the Constitution. The courts expanded them in Maneka Gandhi and Vishaka, failed them in ADM Jabalpur, and repaired that failure in Puttaswamy. Treaties and the 1993 Act completed the structure.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.