munotes®

B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) Sem 8 Human Rights Law and Practice 2020 Nov Question Paper with Solutions

KSLU Solved Question Papers

Human Rights Law and Practice

Previous Year Question Paper with Solution

B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 8

2020 Nov Examination

munotes.in

Mumbai

munotes.in

First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.

Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.

Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.

Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.

munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.

The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.

The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2020 Nov examination.

munotes.in ii
munotes.in iii
munotes.in iv

The Paper as Set

The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2020 Nov examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.

Duration 3 hours  ·  Total marks 100  ·  13 questions answered

How to use this volume

Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.

munotes.in v

Q1What is meant by human rights ? Explain the development of human rights during ancient, medieval and in modern India.[16]

Answer

For full marks, cover: the meaning of human rights (the idea and section 2(1)(d) of the Protection of Human Rights Act 1993); the development in India in phases: (1) ancient India, duties of the ruler under dharma (Kautilya, Ashoka); (2) medieval India (justice as legitimacy, Akbar, the Bhakti and Sufi movements); (3) social reform in the nineteenth century (1829, 1856); (4) the demand for a bill of rights (1895, 1925, 1928, 1931; none in the Government of India Act 1935); (5) the Constituent Assembly and the Constitution (Parts III and IV; Hansa Mehta); (6) the courts after 1950 (Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, the Forty-fourth Amendment, Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, public interest litigation, Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India); (7) treaties and statutes (Covenants 1979, CRC 1992, CEDAW 1993; the 1993 Act and later laws); a table of milestones; an assessment.

munotes.in 1

Meaning of human rights

Human rights are the rights every person has because he or she is a human being. They protect life, liberty, equality and dignity, and they belong to all without distinction of caste, religion, sex or wealth.

Indian law defines them in section 2(1)(d) of the Protection of Human Rights Act 1993. They are "the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in the International Covenants and enforceable by courts in India". The definition joins the Constitution and international law, which is how the law developed in India.

Phase 1: ancient India, the ruler's duty

Ancient India expressed its ideas as the duty of the ruler, not as the right of the subject. The king was bound by dharma, the law of right conduct, and a king who ruled against it lost the ground of his authority.

  1. Kautilya's Arthashastra says that in the happiness of his subjects lies the king's happiness. It requires the king to repay from his treasury property his officers fail to recover. It also requires him to support children, the aged and the helpless.
munotes.in 2
  1. Ashoka's edicts of the third century BCE are the strongest evidence. Rock Edict XII asks respect for all faiths, and Rock Edict XIII records his remorse after the Kalinga war.

But the subject had no right he could enforce in a court, and the varna order made duties and punishments depend on birth.

Phase 2: medieval India

  1. Rulers claimed legitimacy through justice to the subject, with courts that heard complaints against officials.
  2. Akbar abolished the jizya, the tax on non-Muslims, in 1564 and followed a policy of peace with all faiths. Aurangzeb reimposed it in 1679, so the record is mixed.
  3. The Bhakti and Sufi movements attacked caste from below. Kabir, Ravidas and Guru Nanak taught the equal worth of all people, and the Sikh langar fed all castes together.
munotes.in 3

Phase 3: social reform in the nineteenth century

Reformers fought for rights before the word was used. Raja Ram Mohan Roy's campaign led to the ban on sati by Bengal Regulation XVII of 1829. Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar's campaign led to the Hindu Widows' Remarriage Act 1856. Jyotirao and Savitribai Phule opened schools for girls and for children of oppressed castes.

Phase 4: the demand for a bill of rights

Indians demanded written rights decades before independence.

  1. The Constitution of India Bill 1895 asserted free expression, equality before the law and freedom from arbitrary arrest.
  2. The Commonwealth of India Bill 1925 listed seven fundamental rights.
  3. The Nehru Report 1928 listed nineteen, including equality of the sexes and free elementary education.
  4. The Karachi Resolution 1931 of the Indian National Congress joined civil rights with economic demands such as a living wage.

The British refused. The Government of India Act 1935 contained no bill of rights.

munotes.in 4

Phase 5: the Constituent Assembly and the Constitution

The Constituent Assembly met from December 1946. Its Advisory Committee on Fundamental Rights was chaired by Sardar Patel. At the same time India took part in drafting the Universal Declaration. Its delegate Hansa Mehta secured the words "all human beings" in Article 1. The Declaration was adopted on 10 December 1948 and the Constitution on 26 November 1949.

The Constitution came into force on 26 January 1950. It placed civil and political rights in Part III as enforceable Fundamental Rights. Article 32 gave the right to move the Supreme Court to enforce them. It placed economic and social rights in Part IV as Directive Principles, which Article 37 makes unenforceable but fundamental in governance. The split follows the Karachi Resolution.

Phase 6: the courts after 1950

  1. Protecting the core. In Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461, the Court held that Parliament may amend the Constitution but cannot destroy its basic structure. Sikri C.J. said the Universal Declaration "shows how India understood the nature of Human Rights".
munotes.in 5
  1. The Emergency. From 25 June 1975 to 21 March 1977, orders under Article 359 suspended the enforcement of Articles 14, 21 and 22. In ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, AIR 1976 SC 1207, by four to one, the Court held that no detenu could seek habeas corpus. H.R. Khanna J. dissented.
  2. The correction. The Forty-fourth Amendment of 1978 provided that Articles 20 and 21 can never be suspended.
  3. Fair procedure. In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597, a passport was impounded without reasons or a hearing. The Court held that procedure under Article 21 must be right, just and fair. Article 21 then grew to include speedy trial, legal aid, livelihood, health, shelter and a clean environment.
  4. Public interest litigation. From about 1979 the courts accepted letters and petitions from public-spirited persons for prisoners, bonded labourers and the poor. In Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar, (1980) 1 SCC 98, Bihar's own lists showed undertrials held longer than the maximum sentence for their offences. The Court ordered their release and found speedy trial and free legal aid in Article 21.
munotes.in 6
  1. Using treaties. In Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011, there was no law on sexual harassment at work. The Court read CEDAW into Articles 14, 15, 19(1)(g) and 21 and laid down binding guidelines.
  2. Closing the Emergency chapter. In Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1, nine Judges recognised privacy as a fundamental right and overruled ADM Jabalpur.

Phase 7: treaties and statutes

  1. Treaties. India acceded to both Covenants on 10 April 1979, acceded to the CRC on 11 December 1992 and ratified CEDAW on 9 July 1993.
  2. The Protection of Human Rights Act 1993 created the National and State Human Rights Commissions and Human Rights Courts. It was amended in 2006 and 2019.
  3. Other laws protect particular groups:
  • the Protection of Civil Rights Act 1955, against untouchability;
  • the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989;
  • the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005;
munotes.in 7
  • the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009; and
  • the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016.

Milestones

YearStep
1829, 1856Sati banned; widow remarriage allowed
1895 to 1931Indian drafts of a bill of rights; Karachi Resolution
1950Constitution: Parts III and IV
1973Kesavananda Bharati: basic structure
1976 to 1978ADM Jabalpur; the Forty-fourth Amendment
1978Maneka Gandhi: fair procedure
1979India accedes to the two Covenants
1993Protection of Human Rights Act; CEDAW ratified
2017Puttaswamy: privacy; ADM Jabalpur overruled
munotes.in 8

Assessment

India's human rights law grew from Indian demands and then joined international law. Its strengths are a strong Part III, an active Supreme Court and a statutory Commission. Its weaknesses are delay in the courts, preventive detention under Article 22, and Commissions that can only recommend.

Conclusion. Human rights are the inherent rights of every person, defined in India by section 2(1)(d) of the 1993 Act. In India they developed from the ruler's duty under dharma and the reformers' struggles to the bills of rights of 1895 to 1931. They became Parts III and IV of the Constitution. The courts expanded them in Maneka Gandhi and Vishaka, failed them in ADM Jabalpur, and repaired that failure in Puttaswamy. Treaties and the 1993 Act completed the structure.

munotes.in 9

The rest of the answers

The first answer is free. The rest come with the KSLU B.A. LL.B. Semester 8 solved papers.

You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.

Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in

The question paper itself stays free.

Issue

Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.

Done!