KSLU Solved Question Papers
Professional Ethics and Professional Accounting System
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 7
2012 Jun Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Professional Ethics and Professional Accounting System
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 7
2012 Jun Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2012 Jun examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2012 Jun examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2012 Jun examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 2½ hours · Total marks 80 · 20 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Unit I
Answer
For full marks, cover: what the Bar Council of India is (section 4: a body corporate, its ex officio and elected members); its functions under section 7(1), clause by clause, grouped as regulating conduct, discipline, supervising State Bar Councils, legal education and entry, welfare and legal aid, and law reform; its funds (section 7(2)); the rule-making power that gives the functions force (section 49); decided cases with facts and holding showing the functions at work (Bar Council of India v. Bonnie Foi Law College, Gaurav Kumar v. Union of India, Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M.V. Dabholkar); a short note on current work.
The Bar Council of India is created by section 4 of the Advocates Act 1961. It is a body corporate, with perpetual succession and a common seal. Its members are the Attorney-General and the Solicitor-General of India, ex officio. Each State Bar Council also elects one member from among its own members. It elects its own Chairman and Vice-Chairman. It is the national, self-governing body of the legal profession.
Section 7(1) lists the functions. Clause (a), which once gave it a common roll of advocates, was omitted in 1974.
1. Regulating professional conduct.
2. Discipline.
3. Supervising the State Bar Councils.
4. Legal education and entry to the profession.
5. Legal aid and welfare.
6. Law reform and administration.
A function needs a power. Section 49 gives the Bar Council of India power to make rules. Examples are rules on standards of conduct (section 49(1)(c)) and on who may be enrolled (section 49(1)(ag)). Others set the conditions of the right to practise (section 49(1)(ah)). Section 48B lets it give directions to State Bar Councils. Rules on conduct need the approval of the Chief Justice of India (proviso to section 49(1)).
Entry standards. In Bar Council of India v. Bonnie Foi Law College, decided on 10 February 2023, the question was whether the Council could require new advocates to pass an examination. V. Sudeer v. Bar Council of India (1999) had held such rules beyond its power. A Constitution Bench overruled V. Sudeer on this point. Read with section 7 and section 49(1)(ag), the Council may hold the All India Bar Examination, and may decide whether before or after enrolment. This is the education and entry function at its strongest.
Limits on that power. In Gaurav Kumar v. Union of India, decided on 30 July 2024, State Bar Councils had been collecting large sums under many names as a condition of enrolment. The Supreme Court held that neither the State Bar Councils nor the Bar Council of India may charge more than section 24(1)(f) allows. Only the fee and stamp duty fixed there may be demanded. The supervisory and rule-making functions must work within the Act.
Standards of conduct. In Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M.V. Dabholkar, AIR 1976 SC 242, advocates rushed at litigants at the court gates to snatch briefs and undercut fees. The Bar Council of India's disciplinary committee absolved them by splitting rule 36 into three technical elements. The Supreme Court disapproved. It held that the rule must be read as a broad canon of ethics. The case shows the conduct function, and how the Supreme Court corrects the Council when it reads its own rules too narrowly.
The Council's functions keep growing. It issued rules for foreign lawyers and law firms in 2023, amended in May 2025, allowing limited practice on a reciprocal basis under clause (ic). In March 2025 it acted under rule 36 against advocates advertising through social media and influencers. It also sought, and in 2023 obtained, a Supreme Court request to every High Court to set up committees for lawyers' grievances, to curb strikes.
Conclusion. The Bar Council of India, created by section 4, is the apex body of the legal profession. Under section 7 it lays down standards of conduct and disciplinary procedure, and supervises the State Bar Councils. It also controls legal education and entry, organises legal aid and welfare, and supports law reform. Section 49 gives these functions the force of rules. Bonnie Foi confirms its power over entry, Gaurav Kumar sets its limits, and M.V. Dabholkar shows the courts holding it to its own standards.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.