KSLU Solved Question Papers
Criminal Law II
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 7
2022 Oct Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Criminal Law II
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 7
2022 Oct Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2022 Oct examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2022 Oct examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2022 Oct examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 80 · 20 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Unit I
Answer
For full marks, cover: the classes of criminal courts under section 6 of the Code; the territorial units (sections 7 and 8); how each court is constituted (sections 9 to 23); which court tries which offence (section 26); the sentencing powers (sections 28 to 30); several offences at one trial (section 31); the ordinary place of trial (section 177); the leading cases; the matching sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; a conclusion.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 sets up the criminal courts in Chapter II (sections 6 to 25). It gives them power in Chapter III (sections 26 to 35). The word jurisdiction here has two senses. One is the power to try an offence and pass a sentence. The other is the local area within which a court acts.
Besides the High Courts and courts under other laws, every State has four classes of criminal courts:
Every State is a sessions division or a group of them. Each division is a district or consists of districts. A district may be split into sub-divisions. Under section 8, a city or town with a population of more than ten lakh may be declared a metropolitan area. Bombay, Calcutta, Madras and Ahmedabad were deemed metropolitan areas from the start.
Subordination (sections 15 and 19). Judicial Magistrates are subordinate to the Chief Judicial Magistrate and, through him, to the Sessions Judge. Metropolitan Magistrates are subordinate to the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate.
| Court | Highest sentence |
|---|---|
| High Court | Any sentence authorised by law |
| Sessions Judge, Additional Sessions Judge | Any sentence authorised by law; death needs the High Court's confirmation |
| Assistant Sessions Judge | Any sentence except death, life or more than ten years |
| Chief Judicial or Chief Metropolitan Magistrate | Any sentence except death, life or more than seven years |
| First class or Metropolitan Magistrate | Three years, a fine of up to Rs. 10,000, or both |
| Second class Magistrate | One year, a fine of up to Rs. 5,000, or both |
Under section 30, a Magistrate may order imprisonment in default of fine. It cannot exceed his powers, and where imprisonment is part of the sentence, it is limited to one-fourth of the term he could award.
The court may sentence a person convicted of several offences at one trial to a punishment for each. They run one after another unless the court makes them concurrent. The total may exceed the court's power for one offence. But it cannot exceed fourteen years, nor twice that power.
Facts. In O.M. Cherian v. State of Kerala, decided on 11 November 2014, a husband was convicted of cruelty and abetment of his wife's suicide. The sentences were ordered to run consecutively.
Held. Under section 31, the court has a discretion to order concurrent sentences. It must exercise it on the facts. Here the sentences were made concurrent.
Why it bears. It explains how a court uses its power to combine sentences.
Every offence is ordinarily inquired into and tried by a court within whose local area it was committed. Sections 178 to 189 make exceptions, such as offences committed in several places.
Facts. In Satvinder Kaur v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi), decided on 5 October 1999, a wife filed an FIR in Delhi for acts largely done at Patiala. The High Court quashed it for want of territorial jurisdiction.
Held. At the stage of investigation, territorial jurisdiction cannot be decided on the material. Under section 156(2), police proceedings cannot be questioned on that ground. The quashing was set aside.
Why it bears. Territorial limits matter for inquiry and trial, not for registering a case.
From 1 July 2024 the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 replaced the Code. Section 6 keeps four classes but drops Metropolitan Magistrates. Section 8 replaces section 9 and has no Assistant Sessions Judges. Sections 21 to 25 replace sections 26 to 31. Fines rise to Rs. 50,000 and Rs. 10,000, and the cap for consecutive sentences rises to twenty years. Section 197 replaces section 177.
Conclusion. The Code creates a pyramid of courts. Executive Magistrates keep the peace, and Judicial and Metropolitan Magistrates try most offences. The Court of Session tries grave ones, and the High Court stands above. Sections 26 to 31 fix what each may try and how far each may punish. Section 177 ties the trial to the place of the offence. The Sanhita keeps this frame with fewer classes and higher fines.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.