munotes®

B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) Sem 7 Criminal Law II 2020 Nov Question Paper with Solutions

KSLU Solved Question Papers

Criminal Law II

Previous Year Question Paper with Solution

B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 7

2020 Nov Examination

munotes.in

Mumbai

munotes.in

First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.

Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.

Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.

Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.

munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.

The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.

The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2020 Nov examination.

munotes.in ii
munotes.in iii

The Paper as Set

The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2020 Nov examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.

Duration 3 hours  ·  Total marks 100  ·  13 questions answered

How to use this volume

Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.

munotes.in iv

Q1Explain arrest and when a police officer can arrest a person without arrest warrant ?[16]

Answer

For full marks, cover: the meaning of arrest and how it differs from custody (Dinesh Kumar); arrest with a warrant and without one; the link with cognizable offences (section 2(c)); every clause of section 41(1), (a) to (i), with what each means; the two-step test in clause (b) and the record of reasons; non-cognizable offences (section 41(2)) and the notice in section 41A; other powers to arrest without warrant (sections 42, 151 and 432(3)); arrest by a private person and a Magistrate in brief; Joginder Kumar and M.C. Abraham on power and justification; criticism; the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; a conclusion.

Meaning of arrest

The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 nowhere defines arrest. In ordinary terms it means stopping a person and holding him under the authority of law. The person loses his freedom to go where he likes. The law then requires that he answer a criminal charge, or be kept from committing an offence.

munotes.in 1

How an arrest happens. Section 46 says the officer must touch or confine the person's body. No touch is needed where the person submits by word or conduct. So a person who walks into a court, surrenders and asks for bail is in custody and has been arrested in law.

Arrest and custody. Every arrest places a person in custody, but custody can arise without a formal arrest. A person who surrenders before a Magistrate is in the court's custody. That is why he can then ask for bail under section 439.

With a warrant and without one

A warrant is a written order of a court, signed and sealed, directing a named person's arrest (section 70). It is the normal route for less serious crime. For serious crime the law lets the police act at once, without waiting for any court. This is arrest without warrant, and section 41 is its main source.

The dividing line is the class of offence. A "cognizable offence" is one in which a police officer may arrest without warrant (section 2(c)). Column 4 of the First Schedule says, offence by offence, whether this is so. Murder, robbery, rape and theft are cognizable. Simple hurt, defamation and most offences against marriage are not.

munotes.in 2

Section 41(1): the ten situations, clause by clause

Section 41(1) allows any police officer to arrest a person, without a Magistrate's order and without a warrant, in these cases.

  1. Clause (a): a cognizable offence in the officer's presence. If the officer himself sees the offence being committed, he may arrest at once. A constable who sees a chain being snatched is an example.
  2. Clause (b): a cognizable offence punishable with up to seven years. A reasonable complaint, credible information or reasonable suspicion must point to the person. The officer must also pass the two-step test explained below.
  3. Clause (ba): a cognizable offence punishable with more than seven years or death. Credible information is required, and the officer must have reason to believe, on it, that the person committed the offence. The necessity test of clause (b) does not apply here.
  4. Clause (c): a proclaimed offender. This is a person declared so under the Code, after he absconded, or by an order of the State Government.
munotes.in 3
  1. Clause (d): a person found with suspected stolen property. The thing must reasonably look stolen, and the person must reasonably be suspected of an offence about it.
  2. Clause (e): obstruction or escape. This covers a person who obstructs an officer doing his duty. It also covers one who escapes, or tries to escape, from lawful custody.
  3. Clause (f): a suspected deserter. A person reasonably suspected of deserting any of the Armed Forces of the Union may be arrested.
  4. Clause (g): an act done outside India. The act must be one that would be an offence if done in India. The person must also be liable to be held in India under extradition law or otherwise.
  5. Clause (h): a released convict who breaks a rule. This refers to a convict who fails to notify his residence as required by rules under section 356(5).
  6. Clause (i): a requisition from another officer. The request may be written or oral. It must name the person and the offence, and the requesting officer must himself have been able to arrest without warrant.
munotes.in 4

The two-step test in clause (b)

Clause (b) took its present shape from an amendment in force from 1 November 2010. Before arresting for an offence of up to seven years, the officer must be satisfied of two things.

Step one: reason to believe. On the complaint, information or suspicion, he must believe the person committed the offence. A bare allegation is not enough.

Step two: necessity. He must be satisfied that arrest is necessary for at least one of five purposes.

  1. To stop the person committing a further offence.
  2. For a proper investigation.
  3. To stop the person destroying or tampering with evidence.
  4. To stop him inducing, threatening or promising anything to a witness, to keep the witness silent.
  5. Because his presence in court cannot otherwise be ensured.

Writing it down. The officer records his reasons in writing when he arrests. Under the proviso added in 2010, he must also record his reasons whenever he decides not to arrest.

munotes.in 5

Non-cognizable offences and the notice

  1. Section 41(2). No one may be arrested without warrant for a non-cognizable offence. A warrant or a Magistrate's order is needed, except under section 42.
  2. Section 41A. Where arrest is not required under section 41(1), the officer "shall" issue a notice to appear. A person who obeys is not arrested unless the officer records reasons. A person who disobeys, or will not identify himself, may be arrested, subject to any court order.

Other powers to arrest without warrant

  1. Section 42. A person who commits a non-cognizable offence before an officer may be arrested if he refuses his name and address, or gives false ones.
  2. Section 151. An officer who knows of a design to commit a cognizable offence may arrest, if the offence cannot otherwise be prevented. Detention under this power cannot exceed twenty-four hours unless the Code or another law authorises more.
munotes.in 6
  1. Section 432(3). The Government may cancel a conditional suspension or remission of sentence when the condition is broken. The convict may then be arrested by any police officer without warrant.
  2. Special laws. Many statutes give their own officers powers of arrest, such as customs and narcotics laws.

Others who may arrest without warrant

A private person may arrest anyone who commits a non-bailable and cognizable offence in his presence, or a proclaimed offender (section 43). He must hand the person over to the police without unnecessary delay. A Magistrate may arrest, or order the arrest of, a person who commits an offence in his presence within his area (section 44).

The leading cases

Facts. In State of Haryana v. Dinesh Kumar, (2008) 3 SCC 222, decided on 8 January 2008, candidates for posts of police drivers said in their forms that they had never been arrested. They had appeared before Magistrates in criminal cases and been granted bail at once, without formal arrest.

munotes.in 7

Held. Appearing in court and seeking bail is a surrender to custody. The view that no arrest had occurred "goes against the very grain of Sections 46 and 439 of the Code". The Court explained that submission by word or action is enough under section 46. Given the long confusion on the point, the candidates were not treated as having lied.

Why it bears. It shows what counts as an arrest, even without any physical seizure.

Facts. In Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1994) 4 SCC 260, decided on 25 April 1994, a young advocate was called to a senior police officer's office for enquiries and held there. His family could not find him, and he was not produced before a Magistrate.

Held. The existence of the power to arrest is one thing, and the justification for using it is another. No arrest should be made in a routine manner on a bare allegation. The officer must reach a reasonable satisfaction, after some investigation, both of the person's involvement and of the need to arrest.

Why it bears. It is the root of the necessity test now written into clause (b).

munotes.in 8

Facts. In M.C. Abraham v. State of Maharashtra, decided on 20 December 2002, the High Court directed the arrest of company directors in a provident fund case.

Held. "Arrest of an accused is a part of the investigation and is within the discretion of the investigating officer." Section 41 gives a discretion. "A police officer is not always bound to arrest an accused even if the allegation" is of a cognizable offence. The High Court's direction to arrest was set aside.

Why it bears. It confirms that section 41 permits arrest but does not command it.

Criticism

  1. The officer judges necessity himself, and the reasons he records are rarely tested until the person reaches a Magistrate.
  2. Arrests for offences punishable up to seven years remain common, though the 2010 amendment aimed to reduce them.
  3. Section 151 lets the police arrest on a suspected design, which is open to misuse against protesters.
munotes.in 9

Under the Sanhita

From 1 July 2024, section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 replaces section 41. Clauses (a) to (j) of its sub-section (1) keep the same ten situations, with the old clause (ba) now clause (c). Section 35(2) keeps the bar for non-cognizable offences. Sub-sections (3) to (6) now hold the notice that was section 41A. Section 35(7) adds a new limit for an infirm person or one above sixty. Such a person cannot be arrested for an offence punishable with less than three years without a Deputy Superintendent's permission. Section 170 replaces section 151.

Conclusion. Arrest is the lawful restraint of a person, and even a surrender in court counts, as Dinesh Kumar holds. A police officer may arrest without warrant only in the situations listed in section 41(1) and a few other provisions. For offences up to seven years, he must believe the person guilty and find arrest necessary, recording his reasons either way. Joginder Kumar and M.C. Abraham make clear that the power is a discretion to be justified, not a duty to be used in every case.

munotes.in 10

The rest of the answers

The first answer is free. The rest come with the KSLU B.A. LL.B. Semester 7 solved papers.

You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.

Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in

The question paper itself stays free.

Issue

Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.

Done!