KSLU Solved Question Papers
Criminal Law II
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 7
2017 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Criminal Law II
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 7
2017 Dec Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2017 Dec examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2017 Dec examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2017 Dec examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 13 questions answered
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer
For full marks, cover: who may arrest without a warrant under the Code (police, private persons, Magistrates); the police power in section 41 grouped by its grounds, the necessity test, and the notice of appearance (section 41A); other police powers (sections 42, 151 and 432(3)); limits on the power (Mohammed Zubair, Siddharth); arrest by a private person (section 43): the only two cases, what he must do afterwards, and what the police then do; the manner of arrest common to both (sections 46 and 49); pursuit of an escaped person (section 60); arrest by a Magistrate (section 44); a comparison table; criticism; the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; a conclusion.
A warrant is a court's written order to arrest. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 also allows arrest without one, by three classes of persons.
The grounds, grouped. Section 41(1) allows any police officer to arrest without a Magistrate's order or warrant in these situations.
The necessity test (section 41(1)(b)). For offences punishable with up to seven years, the officer must have reason to believe the person committed the offence. He must also be satisfied that arrest is necessary. The purposes are to prevent a further offence, for proper investigation, to protect evidence or witnesses, or to secure attendance. He records his reasons for arresting, and also for not arresting.
The notice instead of arrest (section 41A). Where arrest is not required, the officer must issue a notice to appear. A person who complies is not arrested unless reasons are recorded.
Other police powers.
Non-cognizable offences (section 41(2)). Apart from section 42, no arrest without warrant or a Magistrate's order.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly separated the existence of the power from the justification for using it. An arrest is lawful only if the conditions of section 41 are applied with care to the case. It must not be used as punishment or harassment.
The only two cases. Any private person may arrest, or cause to be arrested, a person who:
He may not arrest for a bailable offence, for a non-cognizable offence, or for any offence he did not himself witness. A citizen who sees a chain-snatching or a house-breaking may act. One who merely hears of a crime may not.
What he must do afterwards (section 43(1)). "Without unnecessary delay", he must hand the person over to a police officer. If no police officer is available, he must take him, or have him taken, in custody to the nearest police station. He must not keep the person in his own custody, question him or punish him.
What the police then do.
Force. A private person, like a police officer, may use all means necessary if the person forcibly resists or tries to evade arrest (section 46(2)). But this does not justify causing the death of a person not accused of an offence punishable with death or life imprisonment (section 46(3)).
An offence may be committed in the presence of an Executive or Judicial Magistrate within his area. He may then arrest the offender himself or order any person to do so. He may also arrest, or direct the arrest of, any person for whose arrest he could issue a warrant.
| Point | Police officer | Private person | Magistrate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source | Sections 41, 42, 151 | Section 43 | Section 44 |
| Offences | Cognizable, and others listed | Non-bailable and cognizable, committed in his presence; proclaimed offender | Any offence in his presence; or where he could issue a warrant |
| After arrest | Produce before a Magistrate within twenty-four hours | Hand over to police without unnecessary delay | Deal with under the Code, including bail |
Facts. In Mohammed Zubair v. State (NCT of Delhi), decided on 20 July 2022, a fact-checking journalist was arrested by the Delhi Police over his tweets. Several more FIRs on similar allegations followed in Uttar Pradesh, keeping him in custody.
Held. "The existence of the power of arrest must be distinguished from the exercise of the power of arrest. The exercise of the power of arrest must be pursued sparingly." Police must apply their minds to the conditions in section 41 before arresting. "Arrest is not meant to be and must not be used as a punitive tool." He was granted interim bail in all the FIRs.
Why it bears. It shows the limits within which the police power under section 41 must be used.
Facts. In Siddharth v. State of Uttar Pradesh, decided on 16 August 2021, a stone supplier was among eighty-four persons named in an FIR registered seven years earlier. He had joined the investigation, and the charge-sheet was ready. He was then issued an arrest memo, because the trial court would not accept a charge-sheet unless the accused was produced in custody.
Held. "Merely because an arrest can be made because it is lawful does not mandate that arrest must be made." Arrest during investigation is needed only where custodial interrogation is required, the crime is heinous, or witnesses may be influenced or the accused may abscond. The word "custody" in section 170 does not require an arrest before the charge-sheet is filed. The High Court's refusal of anticipatory bail was set aside.
Why it bears. It confirms that the power to arrest without warrant is a discretion, not a duty.
From 1 July 2024, sections 35 to 41 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 replace sections 41 to 44. Section 40, replacing section 43, requires the private person to hand over the arrested person "without unnecessary delay, but within six hours". Section 35(7) needs a Deputy Superintendent's permission to arrest an infirm person or one above sixty for an offence punishable with less than three years. Section 43(3) allows handcuffing for listed serious offences, and section 170 replaces section 151.
Conclusion. A police officer may arrest without warrant in the situations listed in section 41 and a few other provisions. He is bound by the necessity test, the notice of appearance and the courts' insistence on restraint, as Mohammed Zubair and Siddharth show. A private person may arrest only one who commits a non-bailable and cognizable offence in his presence, or a proclaimed offender. He must hand that person to the police without unnecessary delay, after which the police re-arrest or release him. A Magistrate may arrest for offences committed before him.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.