KSLU Solved Question Papers
Family Law I (Hindu Law)
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 5
2025 Jun Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Family Law I (Hindu Law)
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 5
2025 Jun Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2025 Jun examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2025 Jun examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2025 Jun examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 80 · 20 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Unit I
Answer
For full marks, cover: the four ancient sources and their order of authority: Sruti (the Vedas, Brahmanas, Aranyakas and Upanishads; little law, but some), Smriti (Dharmasutras and Dharmashastras), the commentaries and digests (Mitakshara, Dayabhaga and the works of each sub-school), and custom (sadachara); the place of the epics and Puranas; how conflicts among them were resolved, and why custom proved strongest (Collector of Madura; Hurpurshad on what custom is); the schools as the product of the commentaries (Sukhram); the place of the ancient sources today; a conclusion.
The ancient sources of Hindu law are those the classical system itself recognised. Manu lists the Vedas, the Smritis, the conduct of the virtuous, and what satisfies one's conscience. Writers today group them as four: Sruti, Smriti, the commentaries and digests, and custom. They were ranked, the first being the highest in theory.
Sruti means "what was heard". It is believed to be revealed to the sages. It comprises the four Vedas (Rig, Yajur, Sama and Atharva), with the Brahmanas, Aranyakas and Upanishads attached to them.
The Sruti is mainly hymns, ritual and philosophy. It contains few rules of law. But it is not silent on family matters. It refers to marriage rites, the importance of a son, and the sharing of property. Its authority lay in giving the later texts their sanction. In theory nothing could stand against it.
Smriti means "what was remembered". These are the texts composed by the sages from their memory of the Sruti and the practice of the virtuous. They came in two stages.
The Smritis are the main written source of the law. They deal with conduct (achara), civil and criminal law and procedure (vyavahara), and penance (prayaschitta). Only vyavahara was enforced by the king's courts.
The Smritis were many and often inconsistent. From about the seventh century, scholars wrote commentaries (tikas) on single Smritis and digests (nibandhas) that collected many. These works did more than explain. They adapted the old texts to the needs of their own time and region.
The schools of Hindu law are the product of these works. Sukhram v. Gauri Shankar, AIR 1968 SC 365, records one difference that grew out of them. Under the Benares school a coparcener cannot sell his undivided interest without the consent of the others. Under the Maharashtra and Madras schools he may sell it for value.
Custom is the practice of a community, followed for so long that it has the force of law. The texts called it sadachara, the conduct of the virtuous. In Hurpurshad v. Sheo Dyal, (1876) LR 3 IA 259, the Privy Council described custom as a rule which, in a particular family or district, has from long usage obtained the force of law. It must be ancient, certain and reasonable.
The Ramayana, the Mahabharata and the Puranas are sometimes added. They contain stories and moral teaching that illustrate rules of conduct. But they are not independent sources of legal rules. Courts have used them only to explain a text or a practice.
In theory the order was strict. Sruti prevailed over Smriti, and Smriti over custom. Where Smritis conflicted, the commentators reconciled them or chose the better view.
In practice the order was reversed at the bottom. A proved custom prevailed over the written texts. In Collector of Madura v. Moottoo Ramalinga Sathupathy, (1868) 12 MIA 397, the Zamindar of Ramnad died without a son or authority to adopt. His widow adopted a boy with the consent of his kinsmen. The Privy Council upheld the adoption under the Dravida school. It said that under the Hindu system of law, clear proof of usage will outweigh the written text of the law.
So custom, the lowest source in theory, was the strongest in practice. It explains much of the regional variety of Hindu law.
The modern sources are justice, equity and good conscience, judicial precedent, and legislation. Since 1955 legislation has replaced most of the ancient law. The Hindu Marriage Act and the Hindu Succession Act override the old texts and customs on the matters they cover. But the ancient sources still govern the joint family, partition and religious endowments, where the Acts are silent. They also explain the origin of many rules the Acts have kept.
Conclusion. The ancient sources of Hindu law are Sruti, Smriti, the commentaries and digests, and custom. The Sruti was highest in theory but held little law. The Smritis were the main written source, and the commentaries adapted them and created the schools, as Sukhram reflects. Custom, ranked last, proved strongest, because clear proof of usage outweighs the written text, as Collector of Madura holds. Legislation now governs most matters, but these sources still rule the joint family and endowments.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.