munotes®

B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) Sem 5 Contract II 2023 Mar Question Paper with Solutions

KSLU Solved Question Papers

Contract II

Previous Year Question Paper with Solution

B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 5

2023 Mar Examination

munotes.in

Mumbai

munotes.in

First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.

Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.

Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.

Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.

munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.

The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.

The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2023 Mar examination.

munotes.in ii
munotes.in iii
munotes.in iv

The Paper as Set

The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2023 Mar examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.

Duration 3 hours  ·  Total marks 80  ·  20 questions answered

Instructions printed on the paper

  • N.B. (1) Answer all five Units. (2) One essay type question and short note/problems is compulsory from each Unit. (3) Figures to the right indicate marks. (4) Answer should be written either in English or Kannada completely.

How to use this volume

Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.

munotes.in v

Q1

Unit I

munotes.in 1

(a)Explain the nature and extent of liability of surety.[10]

Answer

For full marks, cover: the rule of co-extensive liability (section 128) and its illustration on interest and charges; what "co-extensive" measures (extent, not sequence); liability arises only on default (section 126); the creditor need not sue the debtor first (section 137, Bank of Bihar); limits set by the contract (cap, particular transactions, conditions); no liability where there is no valid principal debt (Edavan Kavingal); co-promisors who privately agree one is a surety (section 132); co-sureties' shares (sections 146 and 147); the end of liability by discharge.

The rule

Section 128 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 says: "The liability of the surety is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor, unless it is otherwise provided by the contract."

"Co-extensive" means of the same extent. The surety owes what the debtor owes, no more and no less.

munotes.in 2

Interest and charges. The illustration to section 128 shows how far this goes. A guarantees payment of a bill of exchange by C, the acceptor. C dishonours the bill. A is liable "not only for the amount of the bill, but also for any interest and charges which may have become due on it". A surety who thinks he guaranteed only the principal sum has guaranteed these as well.

When the liability arises

Under section 126, the surety answers for the debtor "in case of his default". So the surety's liability is secondary in the sense that it needs a default. But once the default happens, it is immediate.

The creditor may go straight to the surety

"Co-extensive" measures how much the surety owes, not the order in which the creditor must proceed. The Act does not make the creditor sue the debtor first. Section 137 adds that mere forbearance to sue the debtor does not discharge the surety, unless the guarantee says otherwise.

munotes.in 3

Bank of Bihar Ltd. v. Damodar Prasad, AIR 1969 SC 297, settles the point. A trial court allowed a bank to execute its decree against a surety only after it had exhausted its remedies against the borrower. The Supreme Court removed that condition. A surety's liability is immediate, and without a special equity he cannot make the creditor pursue the debtor first.

Limits set by the contract

The co-extensive rule applies "unless it is otherwise provided by the contract". A surety may therefore limit his liability.

  1. A monetary cap. "My liability shall not exceed Rs 5 lakh." He is then liable only up to that sum, even if the debt is larger.
  2. Particular transactions. He may guarantee one supply only, rather than a running account (see section 129 and its illustration (c)).
  3. A time limit. He may guarantee only debts incurred within a stated period.
  4. A condition. He may require the creditor first to realise a named security, or to give him notice before suing.
munotes.in 4

Suppose a debtor owes Rs 8 lakh and Rs 1 lakh of interest, and the guarantee is capped at Rs 5 lakh. The surety pays Rs 5 lakh. Without the cap, he would owe the full Rs 9 lakh.

No principal liability, no surety's liability

Because the surety's liability is measured by the debtor's, it cannot exist where the debtor has no legal liability at all.

Edavan Kavingal Kelappan Nambiar v. Moolakal Kunhi Raman, AIR 1957 Mad 164, applied this to a loan to a minor. The minor owed nothing in law, so there was no default to guarantee. The surety was held not liable, since his liability "can rest only on a valid obligation".

A private arrangement does not cut down liability to the creditor

Section 132 covers two persons who both undertake a liability to a creditor. Between themselves, they agree that one is liable only on the other's default. That private arrangement does not affect the creditor. Each remains fully liable to him, even if he knew of it.

munotes.in 5

Several sureties

As against the creditor, each surety may be liable for the whole debt, within his own limit. As between themselves, co-sureties share the burden equally, unless they agreed otherwise (section 146). Where they are bound in different sums, they pay equally as far as their limits allow (section 147).

When the liability ends

The surety's liability ends when the debt is paid. It also ends when the Act discharges the surety. Examples are a variance without his consent (section 133) and a release of the debtor (section 134). A binding promise of time to the debtor also discharges him (section 135). So does an act that impairs his remedy (section 139), or the loss of a security (section 141).

Conclusion. Under section 128, the surety's liability is co-extensive with the principal debtor's, including interest and charges, unless the contract limits it. It arises on default and is then immediate, so the creditor may sue the surety first, as Bank of Bihar holds. It may be capped or confined by the contract. It cannot exceed the debtor's own liability, and fails where that liability does not exist, as Edavan Kavingal shows.

munotes.in 6

The rest of the answers

The first answer is free. The rest come with the KSLU B.A. LL.B. Semester 5 solved papers.

You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.

Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in

The question paper itself stays free.

Issue

Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.

Done!