KSLU Solved Question Papers
Constitutional Law I
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 3
2011 Jun Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
KSLU Solved Question Papers
Constitutional Law I
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
B.A. LL.B. (Five Years) · Sem 3
2011 Jun Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 21 October 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of Karnataka State Law University. It is not affiliated with Karnataka State Law University, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by Karnataka State Law University at the 2011 Jun examination.
The questions below are the paper as Karnataka State Law University set it at the 2011 Jun examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2011 Jun examination, reproduced as Karnataka State Law University set them, in the order it set them. Long reading passages are shortened to their first and last lines and our summary; the original paper prints them in full. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 3 hours · Total marks 100 · 20 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Unit I
Answer
For full marks, cover: the Constitution in brief; its salient features in outline, each with its articles; the parliamentary form of government as the feature asked about: why the framers chose it (Dr. Ambedkar, 4 November 1948), its working parts with articles (articles 53, 74, 75, 78, 85, 88, 163, 164), and the cases (Ram Jawaya Kapur, Shamsher Singh, U.N.R. Rao, S.R. Bommai on the floor test, Common Cause on collective responsibility); how the Indian form departs from the British model (table); its place in the basic structure (Kesavananda Bharati); criticism and the Tenth Schedule (Kihoto Hollohan); a conclusion.
The Constitution of India was adopted on 26 November 1949 and came into force on 26 January 1950. It sets up a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic. It divides power between the Union and the States, guarantees rights to individuals, and sets goals of social justice for the State. Among its many features, the question asks for special attention to one: the parliamentary form of government. The other features are first set out in outline.
The Constituent Assembly had to choose between the British and the American models. Dr. Ambedkar explained the choice on 4 November 1948. His words are quoted in Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1974 SC 2192.
He said that one system gives "more stability but less responsibility", and the other "more responsibility but less stability". In the British system, the executive is assessed daily by Parliament, through "questions, resolutions, no-confidence motions, adjournment motions, and debates on addresses". It is also assessed periodically by the voters. He found the daily assessment "far more effective" and "far more necessary in a country like India". He concluded: "The Draft Constitution in recommending the Parliamentary system of executive has preferred more responsibility to more stability."
The formal head. In Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab, AIR 1955 SC 549, the Punjab Government had taken over the publishing of school text books by executive orders. Publishers challenged this. The Court upheld the orders and explained the system. The President is "a formal or constitutional head of the executive". The Cabinet is "a hyphen which joins, a buckle which fastens the legislative part of the State to the executive part".
Advice is binding. In Shamsher Singh, seven judges considered the discharge of two probationary judicial officers by orders in the Governor's name. It was argued that the Governor had to decide personally. The Court held that the President and the Governor act on the advice of their Ministers, save in a few exceptional situations. The satisfaction required is that of the Council of Ministers.
There is always a Ministry. In U.N.R. Rao v. Indira Gandhi, AIR 1971 SC 1002, the Lok Sabha had been dissolved in December 1970. A petitioner claimed that the Prime Minister and her Ministers ceased to hold office at once. The Court rejected the claim. Article 74(1) is mandatory, so the President can never act without a Council of Ministers, even after dissolution.
Majority is tested on the floor. In S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, AIR 1994 SC 1918, a Karnataka Ministry had been dismissed in April 1989 without a vote in the Assembly. The Court held that whether a Ministry has a majority is to be decided on the floor of the House. It is not a matter for the Governor's personal opinion.
Collective responsibility explained. In Common Cause, A Registered Society v. Union of India, (1999) 6 SCC 667, the Court described collective responsibility as "essentially a political concept". It means, first, that all Ministers support the Cabinet's policies and show that unanimity in public. Second, each Minister shares the moral responsibility for the success or failure of those policies, even if he argued against them in the Cabinet.
| Point | Britain | India |
|---|---|---|
| Head of State | Hereditary monarch | President elected indirectly for five years (articles 54, 56) |
| Removal of the head | Not removable | Impeachment for violation of the Constitution (article 61) |
| Source of the rules | Mostly convention | Written text (articles 74, 75) |
| Point | Britain | India |
|---|---|---|
| Supremacy | Parliament is sovereign | The Constitution is supreme; laws face judicial review |
| Structure | Unitary State | Federal; the system works at two levels |
| Defection | No special law | Tenth Schedule (anti-defection law) |
The Prime Minister may also come from either House. Dr. Manmohan Singh was a member of the Rajya Sabha throughout his ten years as Prime Minister.
In Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461, the Court held that Parliament cannot destroy the basic structure of the Constitution. Jaganmohan Reddy J. said that "a sovereign democratic republic, Parliamentary democracy, the three organs of the State" certainly constitute that structure. So the parliamentary form cannot be replaced by an amendment.
The answer lies in Dr. Ambedkar's choice. Instability is the price of responsibility. A Government can be removed at any time when it loses the confidence of the House, without waiting five years.
Conclusion. The Constitution of India has many salient features: a written supreme text, a federation with a strong Centre, rights, directive principles and an independent judiciary. Among them, the parliamentary form of government decides how India is actually governed. The President is the formal head, as Ram Jawaya Kapur and Shamsher Singh hold. The real executive is a Council of Ministers responsible to the Lok Sabha under article 75(3). Its majority is tested on the floor, as S.R. Bommai holds. India adapted the British model to a written, federal Constitution with judicial review. As Kesavananda Bharati shows, it is now part of the basic structure.
The rest of the answers
You have read the question paper and its first answer in full. Buy the solved papers once and you can read every answer of every solved paper in this semester.
Solved papers: ₹499 Already bought it? Sign in
The question paper itself stays free.
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.