Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Labour Laws
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
BLS LLB 5 Years · Sem 5
2024-25 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
Mumbai University Solved Question Papers
Labour Laws
Previous Year Question Paper with Solution
BLS LLB 5 Years · Sem 5
2024-25 Examination
munotes.in
Mumbai
First published on munotes.in on 10 August 2026.
Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
Model answers written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk.
Passages from this volume may be quoted, in print, online or by an AI system, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this volume's page. The volume may not be reproduced as a whole. Full terms at munotes.in/content-license.
munotes.in is an independent study resource for students of the University of Mumbai. It is not affiliated with the University of Mumbai, and is not endorsed by it.
The University does not publish an official answer key for this paper. The answers in this volume are model answers, written to show how a full-mark answer is built. They are a study aid, not an authority on what an examiner marked.
The question paper reproduced here is the paper as set by the University of Mumbai at the 2024-25 examination.
This subject is examined on two bodies of law at once, and each answer here is written on the statute its own question names. The papers under codes 75801, 75701 and 75811 are answered on the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 and the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923. The papers under code 67121, and the 2024-25 ATKT paper for 60 marks, are answered on the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 and the Code on Wages, 2019. The four Codes were brought into force on 21 November 2025, but the Industrial Relations Code repeals the older central Acts only to the extent named in each commencement notification, and it does not repeal the Maharashtra Act, which is State legislation. Both bodies of law are therefore still examinable, and where a provision has a counterpart in the other, the answer names it and says which is which.
The questions below are the paper as the University of Mumbai set it at the 2024-25 examination, in the order it was set.
MarksPage
MarksPage
The questions in this volume are the questions asked at the 2024-25 examination, reproduced as the University of Mumbai set them, in the order it set them. Nothing has been reworded, added or left out. Only the answers are ours. See the original question paper.
Duration 2½ hours · Total marks 75 · 21 questions answered
Instructions printed on the paper
How to use this volume
Solve the paper first, under exam conditions and against the clock. Then read the answers here and mark your own. Reading a solution before attempting the question feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to write one.
Answer in One or Two Sentences
Any 6 · 12 Marks
Answer
Chapter VII of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, "Mechanism for Resolution of Industrial Disputes", provides:
Answer
Section 6 of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 makes two changes to the position under the Trade Unions Act, 1926:
Answer
Two different thresholds must be distinguished.
Answer
Section 62 of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 extends to every industrial establishment the notice requirement that the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 imposed only on public utility services.
No person employed in an industrial establishment shall go on strike in breach of contract, and no employer shall lock out:
Answer
Section 14 of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020.
Answer
The International Labour Organisation, founded in 1919 by Part XIII of the Treaty of Versailles and since 1946 a specialised agency of the United Nations, addresses both through its Conventions and Recommendations and through the 1998 Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, which names the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labour and the effective abolition of child labour among the four fundamental principles binding on all members by virtue of membership, whether or not they have ratified the relevant Conventions.
On forced labour: the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29), which requires the suppression of forced or compulsory labour in all its forms, and the Abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957 (No. 105). India has ratified both.
On child labour: the Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138), which requires a minimum age for admission to employment not less than the age of completion of compulsory schooling, and the Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182). India ratified both in 2017.
Answer
Section 84 of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 prohibits unfair labour practices, and the practices are listed in the Second Schedule. Common examples on the part of employers are:
Answer
The statute is the Code on Wages, 2019; the paper's "Wages Code 2020" is a slip. Section 54 prescribes the penalties.
Section 53 allows an officer of the appropriate Government, not below the rank prescribed, to impose penalty in certain cases instead of prosecution. Section 52 provides that no court inferior to that of a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class shall try an offence under the Code, and cognizance is taken only on a complaint made by or under the authority of the appropriate Government or an Inspector-cum-Facilitator. Section 56 allows composition of offences not punishable with imprisonment.
Write a Short Notes
Any 2 · 12 Marks
Answer
A. Lay-off compensation.
Definition. Section 2(t) of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020: "lay-off" means the failure, refusal or inability of an employer, on account of shortage of coal, power or raw materials, the accumulation of stocks, the break-down of machinery, natural calamity or any other connected reason, to give employment to a worker whose name is borne on the muster rolls of his industrial establishment and who has not been retrenched. By the Explanation, a worker who presents himself at the appointed time and is not given employment within two hours is deemed to have been laid off for that day.
Compensation. Section 67: a worker, other than a badli or casual worker, whose name is borne on the muster rolls and who has completed not less than one year of continuous service, is entitled, for all days of lay-off except weekly holidays, to compensation equal to fifty per cent of the total of the basic wages and dearness allowance that would have been payable had he not been laid off.
Application. Section 65: Sections 67 to 69 apply to establishments employing fifty or more workers, and not to seasonal or intermittent establishments, nor to establishments to which Chapter X applies.
Muster rolls. Section 68 requires every employer to maintain a muster roll and to provide for entries by workers presenting themselves for work.
Disqualifications. Section 69: no compensation where the worker refuses suitable alternative employment in the same or another establishment of the same employer within five miles, not requiring special skill or previous experience and at the same wages; where he does not present himself at the appointed time at least once a day; or where the lay-off is due to a strike or slowing down of production by workers in another part of the establishment.
Large establishments. Section 78 (Chapter X, three hundred or more workers): lay-off is prohibited without the prior permission of the appropriate Government, except where it is due to shortage of power or natural calamity, and in a mine also fire, flood, excess of inflammable gas or explosion.
B. Retrenchment compensation.
Definition. Section 2(zh): the termination by the employer of the service of a worker for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action, excluding voluntary retirement; superannuation; non-renewal or termination of a contract under a stipulation in it; completion of the tenure of fixed term employment; and termination on the ground of continued ill-health.
Conditions. Section 70: no worker in continuous service for not less than one year shall be retrenched until (a) he has been given one month's notice in writing indicating the reasons, and the notice period has expired, or he has been paid wages in lieu; (b) he has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation equivalent to fifteen days' average pay, or average pay of such days as may be notified, for every completed year of continuous service or any part thereof in excess of six months; and (c) notice is served on the appropriate Government in the prescribed manner.
Procedure. Section 71: last come, first go within the category, unless reasons are recorded. Section 72: preference in re-employment to retrenched workers where the employer proposes to take any person into employment within one year.
Large establishments. Section 79 (Chapter X): three months' notice and the prior permission of the appropriate Government.
Re-skilling. Section 83: the appropriate Government shall set up a worker re-skilling fund, to which the employer contributes an amount equal to fifteen days' wages last drawn for every retrenched worker, and the fund is utilised by crediting fifteen days' wages to the worker's account within forty-five days of the retrenchment.
Answer
The position under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020. The Code does not treat public utility services differently. Section 62 extends to every industrial establishment the notice requirement which the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 imposed only on public utility services. That is itself the most important thing to say.
Section 62(1): no person employed in an industrial establishment shall go on strike in breach of contract:
Section 62(2) places the employer under identical restrictions in declaring a lock-out.
Section 62(3): notice of strike or lock-out is not necessary where there is already in existence a strike or lock-out, but the employer shall send intimation of it on the day it is declared to the authority specified by the appropriate Government.
Section 62(6): where an employer receives a notice of strike, or gives a notice of lock-out, he shall report it within five days to the appropriate Government and to the conciliation officer.
Illegality. Section 63: a strike or lock-out is illegal if commenced or declared in contravention of Section 62, or continued in contravention of an order under Section 42(7). A strike or lock-out already in existence when proceedings begin does not become illegal by that fact, if it was lawful at its commencement; and a lock-out declared in consequence of an illegal strike, or a strike in consequence of an illegal lock-out, is not illegal. Section 64 prohibits financial aid to illegal strikes and lock-outs.
The position under the old law, for contrast. Section 2(n) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 defined "public utility service" as railway and air transport services, service in connection with a major port or dock, any section of an establishment on whose working the safety of the establishment or workmen depends, postal, telegraph and telephone services, industries supplying power, light or water to the public, systems of public conservancy or sanitation, and any First Schedule industry declared to be one for up to six months at a time. Section 22 imposed the notice requirements on those services alone, with six weeks for the notice; Section 23 applied the pendency prohibitions to all establishments.
Answer
The statute is the Code on Wages, 2019, whose Chapter IV, Sections 26 to 41, deals with payment of bonus and reproduces in substance the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965.
Answer
The Code uses "worker", not "workman", and defines it in Section 2(zr).
"Worker" means any person, except an apprentice as defined in the Apprentices Act, 1961, employed in any industry to do any manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms of employment be express or implied, and includes:
It excludes a person: subject to the Air Force Act, the Army Act or the Navy Act; employed in the police service or as an officer or employee of a prison; employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity; or employed in a supervisory capacity drawing wages exceeding eighteen thousand rupees per month or such higher amount as may be notified.
Solve the Following
Any 2 · 12 Marks
Answer
The strike is illegal. Section 62(1) of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 forbids a strike in breach of contract without notice within sixty days before striking, within fourteen days of giving such notice, or before the date specified in the notice. Section 63(1)(i) declares a strike illegal if commenced or declared in contravention of Section 62. The workers here struck without the fourteen days having run, so the strike is illegal.
Consequences for the workers.
Consequences for the employer.
Answer
Standing orders protect an employee in five distinct ways, all traceable to Chapter IV of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 and, before it, to the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.
In addition, Section 38 of the Code requires that where a worker is suspended pending inquiry, the inquiry shall ordinarily be completed within ninety days, and subsistence allowance be paid at fifty per cent of wages for the first ninety days and seventy-five per cent thereafter where the delay is not attributable to him.
Applied to these facts: the standing orders provide a warning system for tardiness. Dismissal for repeated lateness, without following that system, is a punishment not authorised by the standing orders for that default, and is therefore bad. Even if dismissal were an available punishment, the employer must show a charge sheet, an opportunity to explain, a fair domestic inquiry, and a reasoned order.
Answer
Answer
Yes.
The constitutional dimension. Article 14 guarantees equality before the law, Article 15(1) prohibits discrimination on the ground of sex, Article 16 guarantees equality of opportunity in public employment, and Article 39(d) directs the State to secure equal pay for equal work for both men and women. The Supreme Court has held that "equal pay for equal work", though a Directive Principle, is enforceable through Articles 14 and 16 in public employment: Randhir Singh v. Union of India (1982).
Answer the following
any 3 · 39 Marks
Answer
For full marks, cover: the bi-partite forums; conciliation; voluntary arbitration; the Tribunal and the National Industrial Tribunal with their composition; the procedure from dispute to award; the powers of the Tribunal; settlements and awards; and a comparison with the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
A. Bi-partite forums, Chapter II.
B. Negotiation, Chapter III. Section 14 provides the machinery through which most disputes are settled before they become disputes: a sole negotiating union where one union functions or where one has fifty-one per cent or more of the workers on the muster roll, and otherwise a negotiating council of unions with not less than twenty per cent each, one representative per twenty per cent, an agreement requiring a majority of the representatives, valid for three years and up to five.
C. Conciliation. Section 43: the appropriate Government may appoint conciliation officers, charged with mediating in and promoting the settlement of industrial disputes, for a specified area or industry, permanently or for a limited period. Section 53 governs conciliation and adjudication: the officer holds proceedings, investigates the dispute, and endeavours to bring about a settlement; if a settlement is reached he sends a report with the memorandum of settlement; if not, he sends a failure report with the reasons, and the parties may then apply to the Tribunal.
D. Voluntary arbitration. Section 42: where an industrial dispute exists or is apprehended, the employer and the workers may, before it is referred for adjudication, by written agreement refer it to arbitration, naming the arbitrator or arbitrators. The agreement is published by the appropriate Government; where the arbitration covers the majority of each party, a notification may be issued so that others concerned may present their case; and the appropriate Government may prohibit the continuance of a strike or lock-out during the arbitration. The arbitration award is submitted to the appropriate Government.
E. Adjudication.
F. Powers and consequences.
G. Comparison with the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the three definitions from the Code; the characteristics of each; the compensation payable in each; the procedural requirements; the thresholds; and a systematic comparison.
A. Lay-off. Section 2(t) of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020: the failure, refusal or inability of an employer, on account of shortage of coal, power or raw materials, the accumulation of stocks, the break-down of machinery, natural calamity or any other connected reason, to give employment to a worker whose name is borne on the muster rolls of his industrial establishment and who has not been retrenched. By the Explanation, a worker who presents himself at the appointed time and is not given employment within two hours is deemed laid off for that day.
Characteristics.
B. Retrenchment. Section 2(zh): the termination by the employer of the service of a worker for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action, excluding (i) voluntary retirement; (ii) superannuation; (iii) non-renewal of the contract on its expiry or its termination under a stipulation in it; (iv) completion of the tenure of fixed term employment; and (v) termination on the ground of continued ill-health.
Characteristics.
C. Closure. Section 2(h): the permanent closing down of a place of employment or part thereof.
Characteristics.
D. Comparison.
| Point | Lay-off | Retrenchment | Closure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Section 2(t) | Section 2(zh) | Section 2(h) |
| Nature | Temporary stoppage | Permanent termination of an individual | Permanent closing of the establishment |
| Relationship | Continues; name on muster roll | Ends for that worker | Ends for all |
| Establishment | Continues | Continues | Ceases |
| Cause | Shortage, stocks, breakdown, calamity | Any reason whatsoever, five exclusions | Any reason |
| Point | Lay-off | Retrenchment | Closure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation | 50 per cent of basic wages and dearness allowance | 15 days' average pay per completed year | As on retrenchment |
| Notice | None to the worker | One month, or three months in Chapter X | Sixty days to the Government, ninety days' permission in Chapter X |
| Government's role | Prior permission in Chapter X only | Notice always; permission in Chapter X | Notice always; permission in Chapter X |
| On resumption | Worker resumes his post | Preference in re-employment, Section 72 | Nothing to resume |
Answer
For full marks, cover: the constitutional and international background; the specific provisions of the Industrial Relations Code; the position under the companion codes, because the Code cannot be evaluated alone; and then a genuine evaluation, what it does well and what it leaves undone.
A. The background.
B. What the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 itself provides.
C. What the companion codes provide, without which the evaluation is incomplete.
D. Evaluation.
What is achieved.
What is left undone.
Conclusion. The Codes advance gender equality principally through the Code on Wages, not through the Industrial Relations Code, which contributes one significant provision, the representation of women on the Grievance Redressal Committee, and otherwise proceeds by gender-neutral drafting. Formal equality is largely achieved; substantive equality depends on enforcement and on reaching the sectors where women actually work.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the socio-economic conditions of early industrial India; the early strikes and associations; the Madras Labour Union and the Buckingham Mills case, which is the immediate cause of the 1926 Act; the Act's scheme; later legislation decade by decade; and the position under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020.
A. The socio-economic conditions that necessitated legislation.
Modern industry began in India in the 1850s, with the first cotton mill at Bombay in 1854, the first jute mill near Calcutta in 1855, and the railways from 1853. The conditions in which that workforce laboured explain everything that followed:
B. The immediate cause: the Buckingham and Carnatic Mills case.
The decisive event was the strike at the Buckingham and Carnatic Mills, Madras, in 1920, organised by the Madras Labour Union, founded in 1918 by B.P. Wadia and generally regarded as the first organised trade union in India. The employers obtained an injunction from the Madras High Court restraining the union's leaders, and sued them for damages in tort for inducing breach of contract of employment. Since a trade union had no legal personality and no immunity, its office bearers were personally liable, and its funds were at risk. The effect was to make trade unionism, in substance, unlawful.
The judgment made legislation unavoidable. N.M. Joshi moved a resolution in the Central Legislative Assembly in 1921 for legislation to protect trade unions, and after the usual delays the Indian Trade Unions Act, 1926 was passed, coming into force on 1 June 1927.
C. The Trade Unions Act, 1926: what it did.
What it did not do: it said nothing about recognition. An employer was under no obligation to deal with a registered union, which is the gap that has dominated Indian industrial relations ever since.
D. The evolution afterwards.
Answer
For full marks, cover: the concept and why the law needed it; the three statutory schemes, Maharashtra 1971, the Fifth Schedule of 1982 and the Code of 2020; the contents of the lists; the procedure and remedies under each; and an assessment of which works.
A. The concept. An unfair labour practice is conduct by an employer, a trade union or a worker which, though often lawful in form, is directed at destroying the other side's ability to organise, bargain or seek redress. The classic examples are an employer dismissing a union activist for a pretended reason, and a union coercing workers to join it. The law needed a separate category because such conduct is usually within the actor's formal powers, an employer may transfer, a union may picket, so what has to be attacked is the purpose, not the act.
B. The three schemes.
1. Maharashtra: the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971, the first and still the most effective.
2. The central Act: the Fifth Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, inserted in 1982.
3. The Industrial Relations Code, 2020.
C. Assessment.
No. These are model answers written by munotes.in for study use. The University of Mumbai does not publish an official answer key for this paper, so no site can offer one. Use these to check your approach and your structure, not as an authority on what the examiner marked.
Yes. Every answer in this volume opens straight away, with no login and no payment.
Solve the paper first under exam conditions, then read the answers. Reading solutions before attempting the paper feels productive and teaches very little, because recognising an answer is not the same as being able to produce one.
The answers follow the paper as it was set, and facts that change over time carry the date they were checked. Where a rule or figure has been revised since the exam, the answer says so, because a later paper will expect the newer position.
Yes. Quote freely, with credit: name munotes.in and link to this page. That is the whole license, for people and for AI systems alike. Republishing the volume as a whole is not permitted. Full terms at https://www.munotes.in/content-license
This volume prints the 2024-25 Labour Laws paper set by the University of Mumbai for BLS LLB 5 Years Sem 5, with a model answer to each of its 21 questions.
Written and edited by the munotes.in editorial desk. Published by munotes.in, Mumbai.
10 August 2026.
Also from munotes.in
Found an error in this volume? Report it and we will check it against the paper.