munotes®

What the Commissions Have in Common, and Where They All Stop

Chapter One Hundred Twelve

Syllabus topic 3, "Enforcement of Human Rights"

Pages 546 to 550 of 760

In one line

What the commissions have in common is a five part design: a statutory or constitutional base, an appointed membership, a function to inquire and to advise, the powers of a civil court while inquiring, and an annual report laid before a legislature; and where they all stop is that the outcome is a recommendation.

The nine bodies studied in this module

BodyBaseComplaint jurisdictionCivil court powersWhere it stops
National Human Rights CommissionProtection of Human Rights Act 1993, s.3s.12(a)s.13s.18 recommends
State Human Rights Commissions1993 Act, s.21s.12 applied by s.21(1)s.13 appliedrecommends
National Commission for Minorities1992 Act, s.3s.9(1)(f)s.9(4)s.9(1) look into and recommend
National Commission for Women1990 Act, s.3s.10(1)(f)s.10(4)s.10 recommend and report
Commission for Scheduled CastesArticle 338art.338(5)(b)art.338(8)art.338(5)(e) recommend
Commission for Scheduled TribesArticle 338Aart.338A(5)(b)art.338A(8)recommend
Commissions for child rights2005 Act, s.3 and s.17s.13(1)(j)s.14s.15 recommends
Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities2016 Act, s.74s.75(1)(b)s.75(2)s.75(3) recommends
National Council for Transgender Persons2019 Act, s.16nonenones.17 advises

Two bodies on the paper are not in that table, and it matters that they are not.

The HIV and AIDS Ombudsman under sections 23 to 30 of the 2017 Act passes an order, within thirty days, with reasons, after hearing both parties, and the civil authorities must assist in execution.

The Maintenance Tribunal under sections 5 to 11 of the 2007 Act passes an order for a monthly allowance, enforced as a fine is levied, with imprisonment behind it.

So the correct statement is not that Indian enforcement machinery always recommends. It is that every COMMISSION recommends and the two bodies that decide are not commissions. That distinction is what turns a repeated criticism into an argument.

The five features they share

A base that is statutory or constitutional, not administrative. Every one is created by an Act or by an article. That gives permanence and a defined mandate, and it means abolition needs a legislature.

An appointed membership, from a small pool, with a fixed term. Chairpersons are retired judges or retired officials; terms are three or five years; the appointing authority is the Government, sometimes on the advice of a committee. The pool is the point of the criticism: a body whose members are appointed by the Government it must criticise is structurally cautious.

A function to inquire and to advise. The verbs recur across all nine: inquire, look into, investigate, review, evaluate, study, recommend, advise, monitor. Not one of them is order, direct, enforce or award.

munotes.in546

The rest of this chapter

Module one is free. The rest of LL.M. Human Rights Law Semester 2 is part of the bundle.

You are reading a chapter from a later module. Everything in module one of every subject stays free, and so does every question paper and the syllabus.

See the semester for ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in

Or just the notes: ₹499

Free either way: question papers, the syllabus, and module one of every subject.

The rest of this subject

These notes are cut from the University's printed syllabus. Open the syllabus itself, or the past papers, for the same subject.

Report or request
Done!