Fraud, Penalties and the Closing Provisions
Chapter One Hundred
Syllabus topic 4.3, Chapter XXIX of the Act, its miscellaneous and closing provisions.
Pages 816 to 830 of 830
In one line
Fraud in relation to a company's affairs is punished with imprisonment of six months to ten years and a fine of one to three times the amount involved, three years being the minimum where public interest is involved; a false statement or false evidence, wrongful withholding of property, improper use of "Limited" and a residual contravention each have their own punishment; penalties are adjudicated by officers of the Central Government with an appeal to the Regional Director; and the Act closes with the repeal of the Companies Act, 1956.
In exam wording: section 447 is punishment for fraud, 448 false statement, 449 false evidence, 450 the residual penalty, 451 and 454A repeated default, 452 wrongful withholding of property, 454 adjudication of penalties, 463 the court's power to grant relief, and 465 the repeal.
Why the law has this at all
The Act's individual sections tell a company what to do. This Chapter tells everybody what happens when they do not, and it does four separate things.
It defines the gravest wrong. Before 2013 the Act had no general offence of fraud, and prosecutions had to be brought under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, whose definitions were not written with companies in mind. Section 447 supplies one, and its Explanation defines fraud so widely that it catches an omission and an abuse of position as much as a positive lie.
It fills the gaps. No draftsman can attach a punishment to every obligation, so section 450 provides one where no other is provided, and section 469(3) does the same for the rules.
It makes enforcement proportionate. A prosecution before a Special Court is heavy machinery for a late filing. Section 454 creates an adjudicating officer who imposes a penalty administratively, with an appeal to the Regional Director, and sections 451 and 454A double the consequence for a repeat within three years.
And it tempers all of it. Section 463 lets a court relieve an officer who acted honestly and reasonably and ought fairly to be excused, which is the answer to the objection that a statute of this weight will punish the merely unlucky.
Some words this chapter uses
Fraud, wrongful gain and wrongful loss are defined in the Explanation to section 447. An adjudicating officer is an officer of the Central Government not below the rank of Registrar. The Regional Director is a person appointed as such by the Central Government. An inactive company and a significant accounting transaction are defined in the Explanation to section 455.
Punishment for fraud: section 447
Without prejudice to any liability including repayment of any debt under this Act or any other law, any person found guilty of fraud involving an amount of at least ten lakh rupees or one per cent of the turnover of the company, whichever is lower, shall be punishable with imprisonment of not less than six months extending to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine of not less than the amount involved in the fraud extending to three times that amount.
The rest of this chapter
Module one is free. The rest of LL.B. 3 Years Semester 3 is part of the bundle.
You are reading a chapter from a later module. Everything in module one of every subject stays free, and so does every question paper and the syllabus.
See the semester for ₹798 Already bought it? Sign in
Free either way: question papers, the syllabus, and module one of every subject.
The rest of this subject
These notes are cut from the University's printed syllabus. Open the syllabus itself, or the past papers, for the same subject.