Page 1
1 1
OVERVIEW OF OPEN AND DISTANCE
LEARNING
Unit structure:
1.0 Objectives
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Distance Education vis-à-vis Traditional Education
1.2.1 Learner-centredness/ learner autonomy
1.2.2 Indirect education
1.2.3 Education in real-life settings
1.3 What is Distance Education
1.4 Distance Education : How
1.5 A clarification of terms
1.5.1 Correspondence education
1.5.2 Open Education
1.6 Significant aspects of Distance Education
1.7 Let us Sum up
1.8 Unit End Exercise
1.0 OBJECTIVES
In this unit, we intend to give you an overview of what we mean by
‘distance education’. however, it should be clear that we can not
capture the term in a conclusive and straitjacketed definition. The
attempt is essentially, therefore, to put together the views of various
thinkers in order to arrive at satisfactory working definition of the term
‘distance education’. In this context, we have also tou ched upon formal
education, non-formal education, correspondence education, etc.,
because this will help us distinguish distance education from other
learning systems.
munotes.in
Page 2
Open and Distance Learning
2 By the end of this unit, you should be able to
argue that distance education is a learning activity;
distinguish distance education from other learning/teaching
processes/ activities; and
explain how distance education becomes a structured system of
learning.
1.1 INTRODUC TION
Distance education is characterised by a non-conformist and non-
traditional approach which, in effect, questions existing norms of
traditional education and seeks to provide a new orientation to educational
processes. It assumes premises about the nature of learning that are
vastly different from those governing the traditional system of education.
Moreover, it has its own dialectic register which arises out of its
ende avour to overcome the problems that are implicit in imparting
instruction to students who are at a distance from the teacher and/or
the institution.
This clearly shows that distance education does not exist in a vacuum.
It is in fact, an outcome of certain socio-historical compulsions and
technological growth: it is a system which is firmly related to social and
cultural environments. The most important development in this regard
is the advancements made in the field of electronic mass media. For
instance, technological growth opens up n ew channels of
communication which, when put to use, can replace the usual chann el, i.e.
oral communication.
1.2 DISTANCE EDUCATION VIS-A VIS
TRADITIONAL EDU CATION
Distance education, in comparison with the conventional educational
system, is a wider system in terms of both connotation and denotat ion. Its
connotation is wider because it works in a much larger learning situation:
a situation in which many factors remain indeterminate and inchoate. It
has a wider denotation in that it covers a considerable distance in
order to effect academic communication.
However, this does not mean that open/ distance learning can be
defined in any precise manne r. It has as many critics as it has
enthusiasts. It remains imprecise and that perhaps enables it to
accommodate many different ideas and aims. Perhaps as Keegan (1986)
suggests, it con not be used in an administrative context. It can be
carried out both in face-to-face encounters and at a distance. Many
distance teaching university have closed, rigid
structures and are slow to respond to the community’s educational needs.
And yet what makes distance teaching distinct is perhaps the fact that
educational technology plays a major role in distance education. munotes.in
Page 3
Overview of Open and Distance Learning of work and economy
3 Education technology itself is a developing field which today includes
audio-visual, aids, the computer, the mass media, etc. It is this fact (i.e.
educational technology is a developing field) that helps make distance
education dynamic and exciting. Along with distance education, one
can also list various other non- traditional forms of education. These
are extension programmes which make available the expertise of a
university or of a college to new populations; adult education programmes
which provide non- traditional learning to adults in selected areas, and
extended campuses that provide lectures at various locations which are
far removed from the official campus.
Nevertheless, following Keegan, one can use ‘distance education’ as a
gene ric term. It would then include a range of teaching/learning strategies
referred to as correspondence education, home study, indep endent
study, external studies or teaching at a distance. Before we proceed any
further, let us work out the following exercise.
Check your progress 1
1. Define the term ‘conventional education’.
The concepts on the basis of which distance education operates distinctly
distinguish it from the traditional educational system.
It operates mainly on the following concepts:
i) Learner – centredness/learner autonomy ii) Indirect education
iii) Education in real-life setting
We have given below a brief account of each of these concepts.
1.2.1 Learner –centredness/learner-autonomy
Unlike formal education, distance education puts the client, i.e. the
student, first and then the institution. Distance education, in
fact, lays empha sis on the needs and covenience of the learners while
taking into account the individual diversity among them and indeed
makes this an operative condition. It works on a concept of time which is
not arbitrary in the sense that it permits individual variation in the time
span required for purposes of study. Further, it does not advocate a
definite time frame for any course of study. In that sense, it is a flexible
kind of system which adapts itself to the needs of the learners as they
actually exist and arise from time to time and place to place. It does not
distinguish between the young learner and the old learner, but provides
them with a possibility that permits individuals to programme their
specific cource of study.
These principles, however, should be unde rstood not in the absolute
sense but in the relative sense. For example, an on- campus
educational programme of th ree years duration meant for young students
of a particular age with prescribed previous education and economic munotes.in
Page 4
Open and Distance Learning
4 and social status is restrictive. If the same programme is made a little
flexible by relaxing the age limit, formal qualifications, the choice of
place to study, and the duration within which the programme could be
completed, then, the degree of learner centredne ss will increase. In
relative terms, a three year programme becomes learner centred, if it
can be completed in six to eight years. Similarly, in all other aspects
too, if the programme is made suitable to the needs of the learners, it
becomes learner centred.
1.2.2 Indirect education
Indirect education sugge sts the existence of a form of education that is
direct. Direct education may be understood as one which assumes the
presence of face-to-face communication. In this context, distance
education can be called ‘indirect’ education because the provision for
face-to-face interaction here is minimal. It is indirect also in the sense
that it provides for as many inputs to learning as can be maintained and
preserved. These inputs to learning are placed at the disposal of the
learner, within whom lies the crucial ability to learn and to make use
of these inputs. Of course, the learners must have the minimum
preparedness and the abilities to learn and complete the course.
1.2.3 Education in real-life setting
One feels that distance education does not have the kind of recognisable
and apparent structure that formal education possesses. It seems
to be amorphous, supine and bloodless, lacking the obvious
dynamism that an oral communicator necessarily imparts. While it
is true that it suffers from an absence of a certain kind of vitality which
only the presence of a teacher can gene rate, it nevertheless compensates
for this by making use of as
many inputs to learning as are possible and by structuring itself around
the actual learning experience of the students. The recent development in
the telecommunication and computer technologies, have increased the
possibilities of teacher-student dialogue and peer group interaction.
Through e-mail and internet facilities, collaborative learning has become
a reality. Given the access to these facilities, distance learners would
feel less lonely and alienated. If some sort of face-to-face teaching-
learning component in the form of summer schools and contact
programmes can be arranged, the loneliness of distance learners can be
reduced still further.
Having touched upon the concepts on which distance education operates,
we shall now unravel the mystery around a few terms which are
commonly used interchangea bly with ‘distance education’. The question
is whether we are correct in doing so.
The confusion over the use of the terms stems from the fact the various
expressions, such as non-formal education, distance education, non-
traditional education and open education, which are currently used in the
field of education are either not properly unde rstood or not adequately munotes.in
Page 5
Overview of Open and Distance Learning of work and economy
5 defined. The reason simply is that educational process unde rlying the
expressions are similar in one or the other aspect, either in terms of their
philosophy or in their procedures. In other words unless one is clear about
the philosophy unde rlying these expressions and also the procedures
which they imply, there is bound to be an element of confusion,
which we should resolve, before we proceed any further.
1.3 WHAT IS DISTANCE EDU CATION
What, then, is distance education? There is no one meaning of the term
distance education. it is known by a variety of names, viz.
‘Correspond ence Education’, ‘Home Study’, Indepen dent study’,
‘External study’, ‘Off-campus Study’, ‘Open Lea rning’, ‘Open
education,’ etc. In Australia, its official name is External system.
“This description is not very much appreciated because it carries vibes of
old Lond on external system which usually provides examination but not
teaching.” This system is prevalent in India also. In some countries,
the term ‘Corresponden ce Edu cation’ is widely used. But it has
increasingly been replaced by the term
‘Independent study’ in North America. ‘Home study’ is sometimes used
to describe correspondence programmes of private schools both in North
America and Europe. This is also disliked by many mainly because some
of the corresponden ce institutions have only profit motive, particularly the
private ones. No doubt, some of them enjoy very good reputation, but
several of them are far from it. Further, several correspond ence
institutions depe nd only on one medium, viz. the print material. The
distance education today lays empha sis not only on print medium but also
on other media. In fact, multi-media approach is the corner-stone of
distance education systems.
In France, it is known as ‘tele-enseignement’. In Germany, it is
described as ‘Frenstudium’ or ‘Fernunterricht’. In Spanish speaking
countries, it is described as ‘education a distancia’. ‘Off- campus’ is a
term which is popularly used for distance education in Australia. ‘Extra-
mural’ refers to distance education in New Zealand. These terms
have come into vogue because of the historical circumstance in
various countries. They have peculiar characteristics of their own, most of
which are similar to distance education. for instance, all of them
emphasise separation of the student from the teacher.
In India, we have been using three terms: ‘External Appe arance’ (private
appearance), ‘Correspondence Education’, and ‘Distance Education’. I
would not regard the first as distance education, because, here a
university permits a student to take the examination as a private
candidate, and if he passes, he is given the degree. The university does
not take any responsibility to impart education to the student. As a
result, he is one his own and very often at the mercy of the mercenary
tutorial institutions. Since university does not give any education, what is
being done under external appearance can best be called ‘private study’
but not distance education. the second, correspondence education, has munotes.in
Page 6
Open and Distance Learning
6 been quite popular in this country. Lately some of them have designated
themselves as Distance Education and Open University System.
In this connection, I would like to invite your attention to the two terms
which are used inter-changeab ly and about which there has been some
controversy. They are ‘Open learning’ and ‘Distance Education’.
‘Open Learning’ covers “a wide range of innovations and reforms in the
educational sector.” Included are changes that aim to improve such
things as the participation of learners, instructional design, methods of
transmitting information and support of learners. A very comprehensive
document entitled “Open Learning” by Mackenzie, Postgate and
Scupham which was brought out by the UNESCO in 1975 describes open
learning as follows: “Such systems are designed to offer oppo rtunities for
part- time study, for learning at a distance and for innovations in the
curriculum. They are intended to allow access to wider section of adult
population, to enable students to compensate for lost oppo rtunities in the
past or to acquire new skills and qualifications for the future. Open
learning systems aim to redress social or educational inequality and to
offer oppo rtunities not provided by conventional colleges or
universities.” In this system, restrictions on learning are few than those in
formal educational institutions. Educational opportunities are planned
deliberately to that access to knowledge is available to individuals in spite
of barriers such as geog raphical distance. It is argued by some that
while distance education is accommodated by an open learning system,
the opposite premise may not be true. As Ruggles and his associates
argue: “Not all the distance education programmes have the
characteristics of an open learning system. Some are very rigid and
inflexible.” In their view, this term may symbolise a new and
emerging philosophy that will become more closely associated with
learning at a distance.
“The term ‘open’ gene rally refers to four aspects: (i) People, where it
would not debar app licants on account of their lack of educational
qualifications; (ii) Place, in the sense that learning would be home-
based and not restricted to class rooms or a campus: (iii) The use of
new methods of teaching: and (iv) Ideas. However, writers on the
subject find the term ‘open learning’ or ‘distance education’
unsatisfactory.
Doubtless, there are several similarities between ‘open learning’ and
‘distance education’. However the term ‘open learning’ conveys
certain amount of vagueness about it. Moreover, when we look at the
open universities and open learning institutions, we find all that is
conveyed by ‘open ness’ is not to be found in quite a few of these
institutions. Open learning, therefore, is always synonymous with Open
University or d istance education. Several open universities and open
learning institutions prescribe certain entry qualifications and they
debar those who do not fulfil the conditions laid down by them.
Therefore, if the idea is to provide educational facilities to larger number
of people scattered all over, i.e. providing greater access to education,
the term ‘distance education’ would be mo re appropriate. This term munotes.in
Page 7
Overview of Open and Distance Learning of work and economy
7 basically empha sises separation of the teacher and the learner, and
planning of educational programmes and material by an educational
organisation and use of technical media on a large scale.
Distance education has the following important characteristics:
The quasi-permanent separation of teacher and learner
throughout the length of the learning process; this distinguishes it
from conventional face-to-face education.
The influence of an educational organisation both in planning and
preparation of learning materials and in the provision of student
suppo rt services; this distinguishes it from private study and teach
yourself programmes.
The use of technical media; print, audio, video or computer, to un ite
teachers and learners and carry the content of the course.
The provision of two-way communication so that the student may
benefit from or even initiate a dialogue; this distinguishes it
from other uses of technology in education.
The quasi-permanent absence of a learning group throughout the
length of the learning process so that people are usually taught as
individuals and not in groups, with the possibility of occasional
meetings for both didactic and socialisation purposes.
1.4 DISTANCE EDU CATION – HOW
Earlier we have explained the concept of distance education. In this
country, broadly, we have two types of distance education institutions:
correspondence courses and open universities. Let me first deal with the
correspondence courses. Before I do that, a reference may briefly be
made to ‘private appea rance’ which is provided by a number of
institutions.
With a view to overcoming the deficiencies of private appea rance and
also to improving the quality of education, correspondence courses have
been introduced by a number of universities. It was in 1961 that the
Central Advisory Board of Education decided to introduce the system of
corresponden ce courses and a Committee was appointed under the
chairmanship of Dr. D. S. Kothari who was the then Chairman of UGC
which recommended in 1961 the starting of such courses. The first
School of Correspondence Courses was started by the University of
Delhi in 1962. The objective of the correspondence courses were clearly
spelt out by Dr. K. L. Shrimali, the then Union Minister of Education
while inaugurating the course. They were:
(i) “to provide an efficient and less expensive method of educational
instruction at a higher level in the context of national development of
India. munotes.in
Page 8
Open and Distance Learning
8
(ii) to provide facilities to pu rsue higher education to all qualified and
willing persons who had failed to join regular university courses due to
personal and economic reasons or because of their inability to get
admission to a regular college, and
(iii) to provide opportunities of academic pu rsuits to educated citizens
through correspondence instruction without disturbing their present
employment.”
The University Grants Commission also encouraged the starting of
correspondence courses and said that these courses are expected to cater
to the following categories of students:
(1) Students who had to discontinue their formal education owing
to pecuniary and other circumstances:
(2) Students in geographically remote areas:
(3) Students who has to discontinue their education because of lack of
aptitude and motivation but who may later on become motivated:
(4) Students who con not find a seat or do not wish to join a regular
college or un iversity department although they have the necessary
qualifications to pursue higher educations;
(5) Individuals who look upon education as a life-long activity
and may either like to pursue their knowledge in an existing
discipline or to acquire knowledge in new areas; and
(6) In-service persons.
Impressd by the potentialities of this form of distance education, i.e.
correspondence courses, the Education Commission (1964-66) in India
recommended strengthening of this system. It observed:
“The correspondence or home-study course is a well-tried and tested
technique. Experience of correspond ence courses in other countries of
the world such as the USA, S weden, USSR, Japan and Australia
where they have been used extensively for a long time…… encourages
us to recommend fuller exploitations of the method of a wide range
of purposes. There is hardly any ground for apprehension that
correspondence courses are an inferior form of education than what is
given in regular school and colleges. Experience abroad and experiments
in India have shown results which on balance tend to strengthen the case
for correspondence education….. The opportunities for part-time
education through programmes like evening colleges and part-time
education through programmes like correspondence courses should
be extended as widely as possible and should also include courses in
science and technology (either at the degree of diploma level). They will
reduce the capital cost to a substantial extent especially as enrolments
grow. They are the only means to provide higher education to those who munotes.in
Page 9
Overview of Open and Distance Learning of work and economy
9 desire to study further but are compelled on economic grounds to take up
employment at the end of the school stage. We suggest that by 1986, at
least one-third of the to tal enrolment in higher education could, with
advantage, be provided through a system of correspondence courses and
evening colleges.”
In response to such encouragem ent, several institutions of higher
learning have introduced correspondence courses. There are now 14
state open universities and more than 200 universities which offer
corresponden ce courses. A Committee appointed by the UGC (Mrs.
Muley Committee) has gone into the working of the correspondence
institutions in the country and has highlighted their deficiencies. In some
of the meeting of the Directors of Correspondence Courses also, such
issues have been raised. Broadly speaking, they are:
(i) Correspondence education is looked down upon and is treated as
a second class system of education.
(ii) Most correspondence institutes provide arts and not science courses.
(iii) Most of them offer the same courses which are offered in the formal
system. As a result, they have the same rigidities with regard to
admissions and examinations.
(iv) Most of them use only one Medium, i.e. print, and are not multi-
media based.
(v) Very few educational institutions in th is country make proper
resource provided by the U.G.C. is very insignificant and
insufficient.
(v) There is practically no co-ordination among correspondence courses
within the country as well as within a State which has led to
duplication of effort and wastage.
(vii) Organisationally, corresponden ce institutes, in the
universities are very weak. They are not given the status they
deserve. The heads of corresponden ce institutes in many
universities are not pernanent. They do not have much voice in the
decision making bodies of the university.
The second type of distance education institutions in India are very
few and new, i.e. the open universities. Several countries of the world
have started open universities to provided innovative education and to
strengthen distance education. They are to be found in the UK, West
Germany, Spain, China, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Canada and
Japan.
The main features of open universities are:
They are, like their conventional counterparts, autonomo us
bodies and are free to take their own decisions and formulate their
courses. munotes.in
Page 10
Open and Distance Learning
10 They use multi-media for instructional purposes-electronic
media is an important component.
There is a strong student support service.
The material is prepared by teams of experts.
Entry qualifications are flexible and relaxed.
One can study according to his own pace of convenience.
There is uniformity in the quality of education, i.e. the students
have access to the same high quality education.
The people working in the se institutions devote their entire time to
distance education. To them it is a cult. What is more, the open
university specialises in distance education and provides multi-media
instruction to its students.
In India we have been very slow in establishing full-fledged open
universities. The Government of India took the initiative in the early 70s
when it appo inted a Committee under the chairmanship of Shri G.
parthasarathty, the then Vice-Chancellor of the JNU, to look into the
feasibility of establishing a National Open University in the country. The
Committee, after a good deal of deliberations, strongly favoured the
establishment of a National Open University.
“In situation of this type where the expansion of enrolments in higher
education has to continue at a terrific pace and where available
resources in terms of men and money are limited, the obvious solution, if
proper standa rds are to be maintained and the demand for higher
education from different sections of the peop le is to be met, is to adopt
the Open University system with its provision of higher education on
part-time basis. The group, therefore, recommends that the
Government of India should establish as early as possible, a
national Open University by an Act of pa rliament.”
The Committee further added that the bene fits of this experiment direct
and indirect are likely to be very substantial. It is interesting to note that
the Parthasarathy Committee took note of the pressures on the
education system and came to a firm view that it was necessary to start an
Open University not only to meet the pressure, but also to give quality
education. We understand that the report of the Committee was
accepted by the Government and a draft bill was also prepared. It is not
known why it was not pursued. Later, the Government of West Bengal
also announced its intention to start an Open University in early
1982. However, it was the Government of Andhra Pradesh which
initiated action earlier than other. 22 Since then it seems to have caught
on and a few other State in the country are showing interest in it.
The University Enqu iry Commission appointed by the Government of
Bihar has suggested that the State Government should start an munotes.in
Page 11
Overview of Open and Distance Learning of work and economy
11 Open University to promote education in the non-formal sector. It argues
that in the altered conditions of life and increasing rush for higher
education, it is desirable to open a venues for non-formal education and
encourage self-effort on the part of the candidates to study when they
can spare time instead of forcing them to waste their money and time by
joining sub-standard colleges. The purpose of Open University has been
very aptly described by this Commission as follows:
“The object of this university should be to help those who wish to
get higher education through self-effort and to provide a wider range
of courses of studies suited to the needs, occupational or personal,
and interests of the students. The university system need not force
anyone whether employed in some occupation or not, to join a
college for receiving education for studying for a university degree. It
should be open to all to employ their spare hours to learn through self-
effort for qua lifying themselves for the university degrees. The Open
University should provide high quality of courses especially suited to
the n eeds of such students and o rganise such guidance and aids which
would help self-learning by those who wish to do so.”
More than in the advanced countries, there is a strong case of
promoting open education systems in a vast country like India. The
conditions prevailing in the country demand this approach to education.
It is accepted by all that there is tremendous pressure for education and
this pressure can not be met by starting formal institutions. The State
have neither the resources nor the qualified personnel to expand formal
education. Therefore, the present policy concerning education has to be
re-examined critically. “The only hope lies in redical and innovative
approach through the avenues of no n-formal education and adoption
of modern educational technology and encouraging self-learning.”
Realising the utility and importance of distance education and with a
view to strengthening it, the Government of India decided to set-up
a National Open University. It was first anno unced by the prime
Minister, Shri Rajiv Gandhi in his broadcast to the nation in Janua ry
1985. Imme diately after that the Ministry of Education initiated action for
setting up this university. A Committee of distinguished educationists was
appointed. Within six months, not only the project Report was prepared,
but also the Bill relating to its setting up was p assed by the
parliament and the University formally came into existence towards the
end of September 1985.
The University has two important functions to perform: (a) to function as
an Open University; and
(b) to maintain and co-ordinate distance education in the country. Its
jurisdiction is the whole country.
The origin of distance education lies basically in the philosophy that
the society has a responsibility to provide educational opportunities
to those who for some reason or the other cannot go to the conventional munotes.in
Page 12
Open and Distance Learning
12 system. There is the case of Eklavya mythology who wanted to learn
under the guru, Dronacharya, who as we all know, refused to take him as
a student because he was neither a Brahmin nor a Kshatriya. However,
Eklavya was determined to learn and what happe ned subsequently is
known to all of us. (The legend goes that Eklavya built a figure in the
image of Dronacharya and started practising archery under its feet.
Subsequently, his skills in archery surprised those of the best pupil of
Dronacharya. What happ ened subsequently is not relevant here. The
point, however, that needs to be made is that today a motivated
learner cannot be and must not be ignored for any reason
whatsoever). In those days a Dronacharya could refuse to take and
Eklavya as a student and the society would tolerate it. Today’s democratic
society cannot afford to overlook the interest of Eklavyas nor can
Dronacharyas say ‘no’ to them. Distance education and the Open
University facilitate this. Open Universities are universities for the
modern Eklavyas. Availability of communication technologies make
this possible today. It is said that there was a time when, if a student
wanted to learn, he had to go to the Aristotle. Today we have the means
to take the Aristotle to the student. Therefore, let us take full advantage
of the technologies available for extending educational opportunities to
all those who want to have access to it.
1.5 A CLARIFICATION OF TERMS
It is an improvement over the single ‘corresponden ce’ mode, since
distance education uses all th e available media for educational
delivery. ‘Open Education’ refers to the approach or the philosophy
behind it.
By formal education we mean the campus-based education at the
school, college and the University levels where curricula and syllabi have
certain established patte rns. The a ge groups, training, methods of
teaching, mate rials (textbooks) used, evaluation etc. are known to the
teacher and the taught. By non-formal education we mean any other
approach to take education to those who have not been able to get formal
education. Distance education refers to the ‘mode’ which does not require
the physical contiguity of the teacher and the learner at all times.
It is not unusual to confuse the terms ‘Correspondence Education’,
‘Distance Education’ and ‘Open Education’ with each other. It is true
openness to metho dology is a characteristic of distance education, but
it should be noted that ‘non-distance
education’ or ‘face-to-face education’ may also use ‘open’ methodologies.
Moreover, ‘distance education’ is possible without being ‘open’. For
example, it can be argued that distance education, as practised at
the German Open University at Hagen, may not come under the category
of ‘open education’, as this University is ‘open’ in limited sense only.
It should be clear that there can be various degree of ‘openness’ of
education. however, at the moment it is difficult to say as to which munotes.in
Page 13
Overview of Open and Distance Learning of work and economy
13 level of ‘openness’ may legitimize the nomenclature ‘open university ‘
for a university,
‘Distance education’ is an expression which officially replaced the earlier
term ‘correspondence education’ in the Twelfth World Conference of the
International Council of Corresponden ce Education, held in Canada in
1982. Since then the Council was renamed as the International Council
for Distance Education. The debate on the search for an appropriate
expression to encompass all the characteristics which had, of late,
come to be associated with what was known as correspond ence
education till recently was accelerated by the emergence of the British
Open University in 1969 and the consensus, as indicated above, was
achieved in 1982. The expression marks a deviation from the
earlier distribution-strategy-based nomenclature to the nomenclature
representative of the spatial and temporal relationship between the sources
and the receiver of education. Having said this, now let us touch upon
‘correspondence education’ and open education’.
Correspondence Education
The distinction between corresponden ce education and distance education
lies in their aims, meth ods, and orientation. Whereas correspondence
education becomes an extension of conventional education as far as its
imparting of prescribed knowledge for issuing of certificates is
concerned, distance education aims at mo re varied goals. These
include personal growth, training for better job prospects and job
enhancement, a change in att itude, etc., in addition to imparting of
knowledge. Distance education also employs a multimedia approach
including human contact. Correspondence education, on the other hand,
depe nds mostly on printed mate rials distributed by post. The procedure
adopted mostly on printed mate rials distributed by post. The procedure
adopted for admissions to the courses and examinations are more or less
the same as have been in use over the centuries in the traditional college/
university education. Thus, correspondence education is essentially a
system based on the mode of
i) distribution to teaching materials, and
ii) of effecting interaction, if needed, between the teacher and the taught.
Distance education contrastingly is oriented towards peda gogy: it tries to
build the teacher in the materials. Now we may turn to the concept of
‘openness’.
Open Education
We may define ‘open education’ as a system of education that does
not ope rate through traditional conventions which are essentially
restrictive in nature – admission restrictions, attendance restrictions,
restrictions on the candidature for examinations, restrictions on the period
of time to be devoted to a course, restrictions on the number of
examinations given and taken in a year, restrictions on subject munotes.in
Page 14
Open and Distance Learning
14 combinations for a particular degree, restrictions on the modes of
didactic communication and the didactic tasks, etc. The larger the
number of such restrictions left unobserved, the higher the degree of the
‘openn ess’ of the types of education under consideration. We should
make clear our point that ‘correspondence/distance education institutes’
may or may not be ‘open’ in the sense we have referred to above, or
may be open only to a limited degree. And in the same way, even a
traditional college/university may become ‘open’ to a recognisable
degree. Research programmes like M. Phil and D. may be put under this
category.
What have we said above?
A diagrammatic representation of what we have discussed is given
below:
(a) Correspondence Distance (c) Open Education
Education Education
refers to the
traditional type of
education given
mainly through
printed materials,
by t he postal
system.
The difference
between (a) a nd (b)
is characterised
essentially by the
advanced strategies
and technologies of
communication
used in (b). obviously, the shift has been effected by advanced in
communication
technology refer to non-
traditional
innovative type of
education that uses all the
possible means of
commu nication,
the postal system
being only one of them.
refers to that kind
of non-conventional
education which has
been weaning away
from
the conventional /
the traditional
school/college/univer
sity education.
The relationship between (b) and (c) is that open
education can be effected easily through distance
education system on the one
hand, and on the ot her advances in the practice of
distance education help and
encourage education to
become more and more
open. Naturally, the two go
together, and therefore, the visible ‘overlap ’. munotes.in
Page 15
Overview of Open and Distance Learning of work and economy
15 Besides these three terms, there are a few more in use currently, but
in the main their currency is localised. They are as follows:
i) External system/studies: This term is in use in Australia. It does
confuse one, when one thinks of the ‘external system’ as it functioned
in London years ago. The London model of ‘external system’
makes it possible for learners to sit for recognised examinations,
but teaching is not necessarily associated with the system. It is obvious
that the term does not connote all that is meant by the term ‘distance
education’ tod ay.
ii) Extra-mural system: This expression is used in New Zealand to
convey what distance education means to most of us.
iii) Independent study: Wedemeyer’s definition of distance education. in
fact, it is through his writings that this term gained currency in North
America.
iv) Home Study: This term is localised mainly in Europe, probab ly
under the influence of Swedish schools of correspondence courses.
However, it is also being used at a few places in Canada and the
USA.
V) Off-campus studies: To denote a contrast with the on- campus
traditional type of studies the expression ‘off-campus studies’ is widely
used in the pacific region – Australia and South-East Asian Countries.
As indicated above, these terms do have local currency. But the term
‘distance education’ enjoys international currency. It may be that these
localised terms are not replaced entirely and immediately by the more
acceptable term ‘distance education’. The fact, however, remains that
most of the current literature and reports on all kinds of activity in the
field are presented under the label ‘distance education’ and /or ‘open
learning’.
1.6 SIGNIFICANT ASPECTS OF DISTANCE
EDUCATION
Obviously, the qu estion of defining distance education is open, and
it will remain so for quite some time to come. The purpose of the
above details will have been served if they enable you to identify the
various characteristics of distance education as it is unde rstood today.
This is exactly what Keegan has already done for us. He brings together
various aspects of these definitions in order to clarify the nature of
distance education. These aspects are
i) the separation of teacher and learner.
ii) the role of the educational organisation
iii) the people of the technical media
iv) two-way communication munotes.in
Page 16
Open and Distance Learning
16 v) the separation of the learner from his peer group
vi) industrialisation
Each of these may be considered briefly as follows:
i) The teacher and the learner are separated from each other and this is
a central characteristic of this form of education.
ii) Distance education is an institutional kind of educational
system. It is, therefore, distinct from private study which may result from
private reading or watching TV or attending a talk, etc.
iii) Distance education makes use of the various technically
advanced media such as printing, telephone, audio-video, broadcasting,
computer, etc.
iv) It is two-way communication because the student is able
therefore can receive through assignment-responses or other media and
therefore can receive feedback. The student thus enters into a dialogue
with the institution.
v) Each student is separated from his/her peer group in the sense that
although the learners form a fairly sizable population they do not have
face-to-face interaction among themselves. Thus distance education
becomes a highly individualised learning system. In this sense, it
remains one of the most individualised of all educational systems. Even
though study groups may be formed un der distance education learning
programmes, these may not be compulsory and the student is free to work
entirely on his/her own.
vi) Distance education is a specific answer to a specific need. It is the
developed industrial society that has created a need for a more capsular
kind of education. At the same time, it is the same society that has
developed the necessary technology to be able to structure an
educational system that will cater to such a specialised kind of need for
education.
In the sense, one can say that distance education is an offshoot of
industrial development. Thus, today one can define distance education
as that field of educational endea vour in which
the learner is quasi-permanently separated from the teacher
throughout the duration of the learning process;
the learner is quasi-permanently separated from the learning group
throughout the duration of the learning process;
a technological medium replaces the inter-personal communication of
conventional, oral group-based education;
the teaching/learning process is institutionalised (thus distinguishing
it from Teach-yourself Programmes) and,
two-way communication is possible between both the student
and t he teacher (thus distinguishing it from other forms of
educational technology). munotes.in
Page 17
Overview of Open and Distance Learning of work and economy
17 In essence, it represents individualisation of the educational processes.
Finally, one must recognise that the concept of distance education is
basically a democratic idea. This is, perhaps, what makes it most
unique. What a lecture says as part of his/her oral and spontaneous
communication within the classroom is in many ways private. At least, it
is restricted to a definite and small number of persons and con not be
captured in any medium for review or revision.
On the other hand, the information that is communicated in a distance
education learning programme is something that is open to public
inspection. Such learning resources, therefore, can be publicly
criticised and can be reviewed and revised from time to time. Hence
one might conclude by saying that the democratistation of the
educational process is possibly achieved in some measure by the
process of distance education. Currently there are 14 state open
Universities and more than 200 Distance Education Institutes are
engaged in imparting education through ODL catering to about 25
percent of enrolment in Higher education institutions.
1.7 LET US SUM UP
In this unit, we attemp ted to give you an overview of the term ‘distance
education’ – with a word of caution that it is not easy to define the term
comprehensively. The attempt was carried out by distinguishing the
system of distance teaching and learning from the other systems of
education. To ward off naïve criticisms against this mode of teaching, we
have, towards the end of the unit, said a few words in justifying
distance education as a learning activity, which is more effective than
the traditional systems of education.
1.8 UN IT END EXER CISE
1. Describe the historical developments of ODL in India.
2. Discuss in detail how distance education is an improvement over
correspondence education.
3. What are the characteristics of distance education?
4. What are the features of open university system.
Reference :
Koul, B.N., Singh, Baushise; Ansari, M. M. (ed) 1988. Studies in
Distance education. New Delhi, AIU.
IGNOU (2008). Growth and Philosophis of D.E. New Delhi, Study
material of PGDDE programme
Harichandan, D (199). Open University System : A broad based attempt
at Distance Education. University News, V0127 No. 36 pages 3-7,
New Delhi, AIU.
munotes.in
Page 18
18 2
BASES OF CURRICULUM FOR ODL
Unit Structure :
2.0 Objectives
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Determinants of Curriculum
2.3 Sociological Bases of Curriculum
2.4 Philosophical Bases of Curriculum
2.5 Psychological Bases of Curriculum
2.6 Let us sum up
2.7 Unit End Exercise
2.0 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit you will be able to: